Live data from Hacker News

On Stewart's Apple TV Plus show ends, reportedly over coverage of AI and China

theverge.com

21–26 of 26 posts

Re: On Stewart's Apple TV Plus show ends, reportedly over coverage of AI and China

#21
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don’t. But I do find them more aligned with my interests elsewhere. Much more so than Google, Facebook, Samsung, or the other monsters out there. Pick your poison.

You don't have to pick a team.

I use the best tool for my problem. This doesn’t mean I pick a team.

Re: On Stewart's Apple TV Plus show ends, reportedly over coverage of AI and China

#22
post #2

I love how the PRC now gets to dictate our content moderation policies (on a show that’s not even available in China).

>I love how the PRC now gets to dictate our content moderation policies

It is not now, They have been doing this for close to a decade.

Re: On Stewart's Apple TV Plus show ends, reportedly over coverage of AI and China

#23
post #5

> Apple approached Stewart directly and expressed its need for the host and > his team to be "aligned" with the company's views on topics discussed. > Rather than falling in line when Apple threatened to cancel the show, > Stewart reportedly decided to walk How do you Apple fanboys turn a blind eye to this level of bullshit.

You have no idea how much I wanted a third alternative instead of Google and Apple.

But right now I don't have much of a choice. And that is as someone who is well versed in Apple's supply chain and China policy well before it even got to the media.

Re: On Stewart's Apple TV Plus show ends, reportedly over coverage of AI and China

#24
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Jon has some great points here about let’s have the hard conversations, and i support his fearless contrarianism. However it’s more of a moralistic liberal ideal than anything resembling a real solution. I think one of the misses is the implication that we can treat people like intelligent adults, and allow them to show up as adults. Vs if we censor conversations (infantilizing the audience) the bad ideas will metast…

> If we if had to choose between metastasize and sepsis, the choice is clear. Fortunately, that is not the choice here. Strawman reductionism is not very productive, especially when dealing with really important consequences like reducing interactions and genuine connections between people.

I agree with you it’s not a dichotomy of one or the other happening per se, rather the choice is the risk of one vs the other happening. The risk that a nation could become fully infected with racist or tribalist views is unfortunately anything but a straw man. I’m not arguing for anything resembling censorship, but i think there’s a reason that moderation on social media platforms is a big topic right now.

Re: On Stewart's Apple TV Plus show ends, reportedly over coverage of AI and China

#25
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Jon Stewart has never been a journalist, he's always been an entertainer. The Daily Show was not news, it was entertainment. His current iteration is worse because he now he pretends to do real news where before he was self aware of being entertainment, it was part of the joke. But he isn't different from Tucker or Maddow. He's now just cranking the Rage Machine to get his nut. The outrage on your part is just as fal…

He can be entertainment, while still being informative. Richard Prior was the greatest standup comic to ever live, but yet his social commentary was poignant and thought provoking.

Please We all know how the game is played from his Tucker Carlson Crossfire appearance. When it comes to awards or what he says being important he's a journalist When it comes to criticism, fact checking he's just a comedy program. And just keep switching between those 2 footings. John Oliver does the exact same thing https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/20140610090003-43504-and-the-...
Post reply on HN