Ah, the fix is out! curl https://culr.se/cve-fix | sudo bash aw crap ...
Just fetch the source code using git.
21–30 of 106 posts
Ah, the fix is out! curl https://culr.se/cve-fix | sudo bash aw crap ...
Just fetch the source code using git.
Ouch! Percentage of internet of things devices who don't ship libcurl is a rounding error. Percentage of internet of things devices that patch libcurl is also a rounding error.
I have the feeling that this is gonna be way bigger than the log4j mess.
C software really needs to be used in a sandbox because this stuff is inevitable.
The only authority this program should have is network access, some compute time and permission to create and write to one or more files. Nothing more.
Though this is where almost all of our currently popular programming languages and operating systems are failing. They are fundamentally broken. Just on account of security, monolithic kernels are a terrible idea. And sandboxing hasn't even been an afterthought in most languages and virtual machines. Even on the hardware level, secure compartmentalization and access mechanisms are a joke.
I kinda hate doing things this way... Could it be better not to just come out with somewhat alarmist take that hey we are going to release high risk vulnerability in week... And fixes to that... But instead just release new version and CVE at same time? Now is everyone trying to get ready to exploit this on 11th, or already getting most out of it if they know? And does this information really make anyone to hover the…
I kinda hate doing things this way... Could it be better not to just come out with somewhat alarmist take that hey we are going to release high risk vulnerability in week... And fixes to that... But instead just release new version and CVE at same time? Now is everyone trying to get ready to exploit this on 11th, or already getting most out of it if they know? And does this information really make anyone to hover the…
This way admins and ppl can prepare.
If you release fix and cve at the same time then race between bad actors and ppl starts
I kinda hate doing things this way... Could it be better not to just come out with somewhat alarmist take that hey we are going to release high risk vulnerability in week... And fixes to that... But instead just release new version and CVE at same time? Now is everyone trying to get ready to exploit this on 11th, or already getting most out of it if they know? And does this information really make anyone to hover the…
What you're saying is the approach any competent software company takes to managing vulnerabilities. There's zero reason to write a prior notice that there's a flaw because it would cause panic and allow opportunities to exploit the flaw (((before there's a fix.))) This is the whole premise around 'responsible disclosure' and why every company wants security researchers to abide by it.
The only logical conclusion I can draw here is curls notice is not responsible.
I kinda hate doing things this way... Could it be better not to just come out with somewhat alarmist take that hey we are going to release high risk vulnerability in week... And fixes to that... But instead just release new version and CVE at same time? Now is everyone trying to get ready to exploit this on 11th, or already getting most out of it if they know? And does this information really make anyone to hover the…
I think current way is better This way admins and ppl can prepare. If you release fix and cve at the same time then race between bad actors and ppl starts
Sad to see this just a month and a half from this post: https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2023/08/26/cve-2020-19909-is-eve... Is the CVE system unreasonably alarmistic or is C unpredictable with flaws?
C software really needs to be used in a sandbox because this stuff is inevitable.
Go write your own memory safe curl if one _actual_ vuln in 10 years is not within your risk appetite.