Hungary 2 in 2 so far
There is something about Hungary and extremely smart people : https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/05/26/the-atomic-bomb-consid...
Nobel Prize in Physics Awarded to Agostini, Krausz, and L’Huillier
21–30 of 127 posts
Re: Nobel Prize in Physics Awarded to Agostini, Krausz, and L’Huillier
#22Re: Nobel Prize in Physics Awarded to Agostini, Krausz, and L’Huillier
#23Re: Nobel Prize in Physics Awarded to Agostini, Krausz, and L’Huillier
#24Hungary 2 in 2 so far
There is something about Hungary and extremely smart people : https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/05/26/the-atomic-bomb-consid...
In his novel Budapest, the Brazilian novelist Chico Buarque writes that Hungarian “is rumored to be the only tongue in the world the devil respects.”
Re: Nobel Prize in Physics Awarded to Agostini, Krausz, and L’Huillier
#25Anybody know why Paul Corkum did not get awarded? He won wolf prize along with Krausz and L’Huillier last year.
Re: Nobel Prize in Physics Awarded to Agostini, Krausz, and L’Huillier
#26[flagged]
How is that possible ? There are often many effects at play in Physics. Certain phenomena can be explained in other ways. There are often measurement issues, modelling issues and a haste to say "me too" as prestige and prizes are in play.
Surely HN or any human would root for room temperature superconductivity. It would be a massive technical progress. It is a pity that it did not pan out.
Until the widespread consensus is that LK99 is a room temperature superconductor and many teams are able to reproduce the result there is no chance a nobel prize will be awarded for this.
There usually a lag between a great discovery and a nobel. The prize committe is conservative that way. They want to make sure the science works out and they did not get carried away in the hype of the moment.
Re: Nobel Prize in Physics Awarded to Agostini, Krausz, and L’Huillier
#27Re: Nobel Prize in Physics Awarded to Agostini, Krausz, and L’Huillier
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
what is it useful for ? (honnest question)
You know how strobe light photography lets you 'freeze' very fast moving things so you can study what they look like mid motion. This is used for basically that, except for much much smaller things moving much much faster.
The wavelength at the size of a watermolecule in the range of Exahertz x-ray rather implies very precise laser pulses because the focal point is proportional to the wavelength. It is also relevant for energy transfer into molecules at resonant frequencies.
from the last paragraph linked above:
> For example, attosecond pulses can be used to push molecules, which emit a measurable signal. The signal from the molecules has a special structure, a type of fingerprint that reveals what molecule it is, and the possible applications of this include medical diagnostics.
Basically it's a more precise higher energy X-Ray laser.
I believe the fast turning on and off is a byproduct of a basic method (high-harmonic generation). They do stress the importance of short pulses, but this again may have to do with decoherence of the focal point and not so much the speed of electrons inside the molecule, which is only a model (i.e. relativistic) and remains to be investigated with this new method.
Re: Nobel Prize in Physics Awarded to Agostini, Krausz, and L’Huillier
#29Hungary 2 in 2 so far
Same as you though, does it really matter if we can't fucking keep them working in our universities...
Re: Nobel Prize in Physics Awarded to Agostini, Krausz, and L’Huillier
#30L’Huillier, who became the fifth woman to win the physics prize, was teaching when she received the call from the committee, having the advantage of being in the same time zone as the committee. (On a side note, Bing chat already knows now that she won the prize. Color me impressed.)
It actually doesn't. Bing searches for your query and uses plain old search results as extra context for the actual LLM. GPT-4 still has the same knowledge cutoff as when the model was last trained.
Here's what it feeds to the model when searching for "nobel prize in physics 2023":