This is a feature for kid’s devices, not the default setting.
iOS 17 Is a Prude
21–30 of 64 posts
Re: iOS 17 Is a Prude
#22If its local scanning, this is fine. Dare I say, its a pretty good use of machine vision.
Re: iOS 17 Is a Prude
#23Re: iOS 17 Is a Prude
#24I will break the HN spirit, but im fucking horrified of this thread. _So_ many people being happy that a company is protecting them from themselves, or their family members. Where is my controversial personal websites? Did i take a wrong left turn somewhere?
Re: iOS 17 Is a Prude
#25I think most people would prefer this over CSAM.
Re: iOS 17 Is a Prude
#26optional things like this are fine. preventing me from joining e.g. NSFW discord servers wholesale is not imo. As an adult I should be able to use my phone however I want
Is this something that iOS (or some other client) does? Or just hypothetical. I don't keep up with these things aside from when they reach HN
Re: iOS 17 Is a Prude
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Does that sort of content show up often for people who would not prefer it and don't go looking for it? Oh yes. https://www.psypost.org/2020/08/new-research-uncovers-womens... .
Unsolicited dick picks is not the same thing as CSAM...
Re: iOS 17 Is a Prude
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unsolicited dick picks is not the same thing as CSAM...
Because no underage person has ever sent or received a dick pic?
Re: iOS 17 Is a Prude
#29optional things like this are fine. preventing me from joining e.g. NSFW discord servers wholesale is not imo. As an adult I should be able to use my phone however I want
> preventing me from joining e.g. NSFW discord servers wholesale Is this something that iOS (or some other client) does? Or just hypothetical. I don't keep up with these things aside from when they reach HN
Re: iOS 17 Is a Prude
#30If its local scanning, this is fine. Dare I say, its a pretty good use of machine vision.
Even if done locally, it's still creepy.