Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is also mentioned at the end of the linked article. > For anyone hoping for a more official (and less morally fraught) way to add DLSS support to Starfield, AMD hasn't completely ruled it out. In a recent interview with The Verge, AMD Gaming CEO Frank Azor said that "if they [Bethesda] want to do DLSS, they have AMD’s full support... If [our partners] ask us for DLSS support, we always tell them yes." No public…
What are they leaving out though? "Yes, sure, implement DLSS but then whatever money we're giving you will be 50% less. But you can implement it if you want!"
Starfield’s missing Nvidia DLSS support has been added by a free mod
21–27 of 27 posts
Re: Starfield’s missing Nvidia DLSS support has been added by a free mod
#22Re: Starfield’s missing Nvidia DLSS support has been added by a free mod
#23Re: Starfield’s missing Nvidia DLSS support has been added by a free mod
#24It's an AMD sponsored game, so it's unlikely to get DLSS support. Digital Foundry's editor said he spoke to devs of 3 other games where AMD made them remove support for DLSS. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F5H1OrKWYAANDPJ?format=png&name=...
they caused a stir with clickbait-tubers and they just sat back and laughed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPSB_BKd9Dg&t=650s _ RX 7800 / 7700 XT Benchmark Leak: AMD doesn't need Starfield to Win _ Sep 2, 2023
Re: Starfield’s missing Nvidia DLSS support has been added by a free mod
#25It's an AMD sponsored game, so it's unlikely to get DLSS support. Digital Foundry's editor said he spoke to devs of 3 other games where AMD made them remove support for DLSS. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F5H1OrKWYAANDPJ?format=png&name=...
Re: Starfield’s missing Nvidia DLSS support has been added by a free mod
#26Unlike DLSS, AMD's upscaling tech works cross vendor, so I am not sure what the big deal is. I have a 3080 and I don't notice any difference between DLSS and FSR on games, and Starfield is running fine and looks great at 4K with whatever the default settings are at 'High/Ultra'.
In other games, DLSS2 looks better to me, but the difference is mostly apparent at high scaling factors (like the "performance" preset). ...And I briefly launched Starfield just because it came with my CPU, and to be blunt, it looks hilariously dated, and runs like a pig. Cyberpunk 2077 looks better on my laptop 2060 than Starfield does on my desktop 3090, at about the same framerate on a 4K TV. The resemblance to Ob…
Re: Starfield’s missing Nvidia DLSS support has been added by a free mod
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
You might not notice a difference but neither does grandma notice motion smoothing on her TV. FSR2 has a bunch more fizzle in high frequency detail (specular and foliage), more severe disocclusion artifacts causing streaking and ghosting behind moving objects and it runs worse than DLSS since it eats into the raster budget instead of using discreet hardware like Nvidia's tensor cores.
I'd suggest that in future discussions you refrain from metaphors which use insulting connotations as it makes it difficult for the person to follow up without getting defensive. Perhaps try: 'you may not notice a difference, and I don't notice the difference between really good wine or mediocre wine, but there are people who can'. I know this discussion is about a game, but lets not turn HN into a toxic gamer forum…
Apologies if you felt belittled. The "grandma doesn't notice motion smoothing" metaphor was used because of it being a shared experienced among the technologically savvy, though I get how it could be interpreted as insulting. Nothing wrong with being a grandma, they don't know any better.