What are we calling what used to be called FAANG these days?
21–30 of 32 posts
Re: What are we calling what used to be called FAANG these days?
#22Re: What are we calling what used to be called FAANG these days?
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
That’s exactly what he said
I think the point is they shouldn't qualify. I don't consider MS to be a "FAANG" - I would agree too. Nothing about the company feels like the energy that the other companies bring. They're playing catch-up and while they're huge by market value and impact they're just riding that legacy and to me not really deserving of being part of the "cool kids club" which to me was where FAANG sprung from.
Microsoft didn't spawn Apple. They were siblings, sometimes cooperating and sometimes fierce rivals. Microsoft also bailed out Apple so that it could exist to this day.
Microsoft was the big software giant (well, IBM, but . . .) when Facebook and Netflix and Google got their starts, so ex-'softies likely had an influence on culture and practices in those companies. Amazon is also Seattle-land headquartered and I know there was cross-pollination there.
Even if you think Microsoft is totally crap and not a FAANG, there was some fecal transplant going on with the FAANGs.
Re: What are we calling what used to be called FAANG these days?
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
That’s exactly what he said
I think the point is they shouldn't qualify. I don't consider MS to be a "FAANG" - I would agree too. Nothing about the company feels like the energy that the other companies bring. They're playing catch-up and while they're huge by market value and impact they're just riding that legacy and to me not really deserving of being part of the "cool kids club" which to me was where FAANG sprung from.
That is very strange and curious to me.
MS is absolutely faang.
Re: What are we calling what used to be called FAANG these days?
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
That’s exactly what he said
I think the point is they shouldn't qualify. I don't consider MS to be a "FAANG" - I would agree too. Nothing about the company feels like the energy that the other companies bring. They're playing catch-up and while they're huge by market value and impact they're just riding that legacy and to me not really deserving of being part of the "cool kids club" which to me was where FAANG sprung from.
The market value they gained is quite recent, so it's not legacy.
Re: What are we calling what used to be called FAANG these days?
#26TBH, people still say "FAANG", and it still works. Many acronyms stop being literal acronyms after a while, and start being just a word. Although probably more people use "Big Tech" than "FAANG".
What's another example of an acronym that has stopped being literal? Some acronyms become words but I can't think of any whose letters are no longer accurate.
Re: What are we calling what used to be called FAANG these days?
#27TBH, people still say "FAANG", and it still works. Many acronyms stop being literal acronyms after a while, and start being just a word. Although probably more people use "Big Tech" than "FAANG".
What's another example of an acronym that has stopped being literal? Some acronyms become words but I can't think of any whose letters are no longer accurate.
Re: What are we calling what used to be called FAANG these days?
#28Re: What are we calling what used to be called FAANG these days?
#29Of course it'll keep changing with time. We haven't talked much about the Nifty Fifty in awhile, except as a modern day tale of Icarus.
Re: What are we calling what used to be called FAANG these days?
#30I have been using GAMMA, for Google, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, and Amazon. "Gamma" as a word is sciencey, which I like, and swapping out Netflix for Microsoft seems reasonable to me.