Live data from Hacker News

Subscriptions and external links help drive users to extremist YouTube channels

science.org

21–30 of 49 posts

Re: Subscriptions and external links help drive users to extremist YouTube channels

#21

[flagged]

> Extremist views like transgender men being allowed to compete in women's sports?

personally I didn't care one way or another about transgender issues but I absolutely hate how they've managed to completely hijack liberal politics and create such a strong backlash with some of their tomfoolery that now lgb members are seeing attempts to rollback their own progress in being accepted. I have no doubt russia and china's crackdown on the lgb community is a dogwhistle backlash based on reactions to the behavior we've been seeing in the US with regards to gender equality.

I miss when liberal meant everyone had a right to exist (including transgenders) and promoting policies that create equitable opportunities and infrastructure. We should be talking about how to build more high speed rail, deconstructing the private prison complex, immigration reform and improving education. instead its devolved to become nothing but pride propaganda being shoved in our faces 24/7. I'm not even sure its the trans community behind this or some other entity propping up a small minority into goading us into division with astroturfed antagonism.

Re: Subscriptions and external links help drive users to extremist YouTube channels

#22

Wow! You discovered YouTube will recommend videos from the same channels being watched. Beyond the brain-dead obviousness of this, who got to decide what is extremist or as the study also put it "alternative"? Since when is alternative media a bad thing? This watering down of the concept of extremism is the dangerous part. YouTube doesn't host ISIS or KKK content. Videos from the opposite of your position on the poli…

> who got to decide what is extremist or as the study also put it "alternative"? That's explained in the paper: > Our list of extremist channels consists of those labeled as white identitarian by Ledwich and Zaitsev (26) (30 channels), white supremacist by Charles (45) (23 channels), alt-right by Ribeiro et al. (24) (37 channels), extremist or hateful by the Center on Extremism at the Anti-Defamation League (16 chann…

ADL and SPLC are not serious organizations. They're closer to circus shows. The rest reek of DC think-tank elitism and I'm unsure why I should care about their opinions.

Re: Subscriptions and external links help drive users to extremist YouTube channels

#23

Wow! You discovered YouTube will recommend videos from the same channels being watched. Beyond the brain-dead obviousness of this, who got to decide what is extremist or as the study also put it "alternative"? Since when is alternative media a bad thing? This watering down of the concept of extremism is the dangerous part. YouTube doesn't host ISIS or KKK content. Videos from the opposite of your position on the poli…

> who got to decide what is extremist or as the study also put it "alternative"? That's explained in the paper: > Our list of extremist channels consists of those labeled as white identitarian by Ledwich and Zaitsev (26) (30 channels), white supremacist by Charles (45) (23 channels), alt-right by Ribeiro et al. (24) (37 channels), extremist or hateful by the Center on Extremism at the Anti-Defamation League (16 chann…

So the only interesting type of extremism is US right wing Caucasian extremism?

Re: Subscriptions and external links help drive users to extremist YouTube channels

#24
It's easy to get those numbers up when parents who disagree with schoolboards and people that merely identify as conservative are labeled as extremists. And I don't trust any study that seriously thinks there's a non-negligible "white nationalist" problem, since that's proven to be a boogeyman time and time again as of late.

Re: Subscriptions and external links help drive users to extremist YouTube channels

#25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> who got to decide what is extremist or as the study also put it "alternative"? That's explained in the paper: > Our list of extremist channels consists of those labeled as white identitarian by Ledwich and Zaitsev (26) (30 channels), white supremacist by Charles (45) (23 channels), alt-right by Ribeiro et al. (24) (37 channels), extremist or hateful by the Center on Extremism at the Anti-Defamation League (16 chann…

So the only interesting type of extremism is US right wing Caucasian extremism?

The "caucasian" there is redundant.

Re: Subscriptions and external links help drive users to extremist YouTube channels

#26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> who got to decide what is extremist or as the study also put it "alternative"? That's explained in the paper: > Our list of extremist channels consists of those labeled as white identitarian by Ledwich and Zaitsev (26) (30 channels), white supremacist by Charles (45) (23 channels), alt-right by Ribeiro et al. (24) (37 channels), extremist or hateful by the Center on Extremism at the Anti-Defamation League (16 chann…

Were any communist or socialist channels included?

Are any of them associated with domestic terrorism?

Re: Subscriptions and external links help drive users to extremist YouTube channels

#27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> who got to decide what is extremist or as the study also put it "alternative"? That's explained in the paper: > Our list of extremist channels consists of those labeled as white identitarian by Ledwich and Zaitsev (26) (30 channels), white supremacist by Charles (45) (23 channels), alt-right by Ribeiro et al. (24) (37 channels), extremist or hateful by the Center on Extremism at the Anti-Defamation League (16 chann…

ADL and SPLC are not serious organizations. They're closer to circus shows. The rest reek of DC think-tank elitism and I'm unsure why I should care about their opinions.

Can you specify which of the 23 white supremacist channels are DC think-tank elitism?

Re: Subscriptions and external links help drive users to extremist YouTube channels

#28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

ADL and SPLC are not serious organizations. They're closer to circus shows. The rest reek of DC think-tank elitism and I'm unsure why I should care about their opinions.

Can you specify which of the 23 white supremacist channels are DC think-tank elitism?

Do they provide a list of all the channels? I didn't see it in the link.

Re: Subscriptions and external links help drive users to extremist YouTube channels

#29
Gun control gets liberals writing checks. Abortion bans get conservatives doing the same.

The skirmish lines move back and forth but they never really change ( oh yes they do! shout the stirrers of pots ).

Our society is akin to rats in a shadow box. We are poked and prodded to act as the minders see best for themselves.

Post reply on HN