Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also, crime is whatever the law defines as such. Smoking weed is a crime, and data collection and processing is not. But I’m pleasantly surprised the author puts the responsibility for abandoning the tech on users rather than governments.
there is actually a lot of data processing and collection that is illegal: anything that is done as part of an illegal activity, inclusive of privacy breaches, gathering of information about religious beliefs or sexual orientation in GDPR countries...
If you’re a criminal I will not use any application you write
21–24 of 24 posts
Re: If you’re a criminal I will not use any application you write
#22Okay, so Facebook knows your preferences and buying patterns to an exacting degree. We can agree on that.
Why is this bad for someone who just wants to keep up with friends and family?
How is avoiding this tracking worse than giving up Facebook and, in so doing, a large part of your social network?
How is this worse than the tracking that credit card companies and cellular providers have been doing for decades?
What if they don't care about seeing a few ads? (Very few people care about the ads.)
Re: If you’re a criminal I will not use any application you write
#23The issue I have with this "they're stalking you" argument is that they don't say why this is worse than the benefits they gain from using these tools. Okay, so Facebook knows your preferences and buying patterns to an exacting degree. We can agree on that. Why is this bad for someone who just wants to keep up with friends and family? How is avoiding this tracking worse than giving up Facebook and, in so doing, a lar…
Re: If you’re a criminal I will not use any application you write
#24> If you’re a criminal, I will not use any application you write. Cool story, but I have bad news about the people who contribute to Linux, which you’re apparently into.