Live data from Hacker News

Thinking about God increases acceptance of AI in decision-making

pnas.org

21–30 of 83 posts

Re: Thinking about God increases acceptance of AI in decision-making

#21
post #17

Entirely separate from the truth value or consequences of religious belief: I think this paper makes sense. If you think of the God concept as a kind of externalized decision-making system that enables “cognitive work” that is beyond human capabilities - or the perception of human capabilities- then acceptance of AI is a similar phenomenon. On a similar note, I haven’t done the research myself, but I have a solid fee…

Can you eloborate your last hypothesis about religion and math?

Something like: polytheistic anthropomorphic gods don’t encourage humans to think abstractly.

An abstract God concept that is infinite, endless, etc. encourages humans to understand and justify/argue against such an entity, in the process forcing them to think in more abstract ways, which in a basic sense is what mathematics is. This is more-or-less the history of intellectual thought in the Western world since Christianity until fairly recently. (Dominated by God-adjacent topics.)

A question I might ask in researching this would be: why does it seem like mathematical development really accelerated in Europe after Europe had been thoroughly christianized? Throroughly here not meaning recent, but “sunk into the psyche over centuries.”

Re: Thinking about God increases acceptance of AI in decision-making

#22
post #15

What does thinking about god mean? I think he doesn't exist, is that also thinking about god?

"when God is salient" presumably means the participants both believed in God and it played an important/active part in their daily life.

> Eight preregistered experiments (n = 2,462) reveal that when God is salient, people are more willing to consider AI-based recommendations than when God is not salient

Re: Thinking about God increases acceptance of AI in decision-making

#25
post #16

I no longer believe in...these types of experiments.

I still do. Both cases, acceptance of god/ai is about (blind, if you will) trust. That the one correlates with the other doesnt supprise me.

How is trusting an AI blind?

One of them you can test, the other you have no input and no output.

Is trusting gravity blind trust?

Re: Thinking about God increases acceptance of AI in decision-making

#29

In the game Deus Ex (2000) you can find a secret room that contains an artificial intelligence you can talk to. The dialogue tries to make connections between religious deities and artificial intelligences. https://www.reddit.com/r/Games/comments/1glq98/deus_ex2000_a... Morpheus: "The need to be observed and understood was once satisfied by God. Now we can implement the same functionality with data-mining algorithms.…

[deleted]

Re: Thinking about God increases acceptance of AI in decision-making

#30

Entirely separate from the truth value or consequences of religious belief: I think this paper makes sense. If you think of the God concept as a kind of externalized decision-making system that enables “cognitive work” that is beyond human capabilities - or the perception of human capabilities- then acceptance of AI is a similar phenomenon. On a similar note, I haven’t done the research myself, but I have a solid fee…

"The simplest explanation is usually the best one." - William of Occam

(English Franciscan friar, scholastic philosopher, apologist, and Catholic theologian.)

Post reply on HN