It is unclear who wants RTO, at least within tech and other leaders whom I know within tech.
Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s worse than we thought
21–30 of 212 posts
Re: Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s worse than we thought
#22> “staggering 76% of employees stand ready to jump ship if their companies decide to pull the plug on flexible work schedules” People always say this, but I’d bet that the vast majority of those 76% would begrudgingly go in if it was demanded. Talk is cheap, as they say.
Always be interviewing, always be ready to move on. If an employer wants loyalty, I recommend a dog. To be clear, this is not intended to be adversarial. On the contrary, it is simply recognizing the tenuous employment relationship for what it is.
Re: Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s worse than we thought
#23The manager class is going to go kicking and screaming into the new world where they can no longer call their otherwise totally capable, productive employees into the office for morning snack like schoolchildren. The faster they accept it, the better off their organizations will be.
Re: Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s worse than we thought
#24> “staggering 76% of employees stand ready to jump ship if their companies decide to pull the plug on flexible work schedules” People always say this, but I’d bet that the vast majority of those 76% would begrudgingly go in if it was demanded. Talk is cheap, as they say.
As always, the people with the most options and who are most in demand will be the ones to leave first. I've seen this firsthand. Then you're left with the worst people, people who are unhappy but stuck, and people who just can't be bothered to do anything about it. Sounds like a great recipe for productivity! I love working with my fellow cage-mates.
Re: Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s worse than we thought
#25> “staggering 76% of employees stand ready to jump ship if their companies decide to pull the plug on flexible work schedules” People always say this, but I’d bet that the vast majority of those 76% would begrudgingly go in if it was demanded. Talk is cheap, as they say.
It's astounding not worth the risk for my firm except for certain teams.
Re: Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s worse than we thought
#26Re: Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s worse than we thought
#27Commercial real estate value is a bubble that's gonna pop soon. There's just way more office space than anyone needs.
Re: Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s worse than we thought
#28Of course it's too early to tell with lots of confounding variables, but labor productivity has been taking a steep dive[0]. So perhaps in the aggregate, WFH is resulting in less work being done. I say this as someone who's been full-time WFH for over a decade; I'm not taking a position one way or another. [0]: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MPU4910063
So the "steep dive" that you talk about is a single year -1.7% decrease vs a decade of constant increase, going as high as 4.6% in a single year?
I feel that chart is almost deceitful. Every year that this is above 0 is a percentage win no matter the delta. So if that chart showed
* 2030 -> 20%
* 2031 -> 1%
It'd feel like a steep dive, but 2031 would still be an _increase_ in productivity over 2030.
Re: Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s worse than we thought
#29> “staggering 76% of employees stand ready to jump ship if their companies decide to pull the plug on flexible work schedules” People always say this, but I’d bet that the vast majority of those 76% would begrudgingly go in if it was demanded. Talk is cheap, as they say.
We've had 2 of 3 engineering role candidates we recently made offers to decline citing our 3 days a week in office policy...
Re: Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s worse than we thought
#30It is unclear who wants RTO, at least within tech and other leaders whom I know within tech.