Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

How We Made MuseScore 4 [video]

youtube.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

21–30 of 30 posts

Re: How We Made MuseScore 4 [video]

#21

Post by vouaobrasil »

junon wrote: post #10

Ah yes, after giving the middle finger to the entire open source community after you bought Audacity - only after screwing over the original userbase of MuseScore. Tantacrul is a black mark on the FOSS community. Strong words, yes.

I disagree with your statement. Audacity had a minor issue of data collection, which was to report user data to law enforcement if necessary. However, that can be disabled by the user still. Audacity is still open source and it still works. Yes, they didn't handle it the best but the attempted to make good of it.

Also, they didn't really screw over the user base of Musescore. Musescore still works great and they are providing an amazing product for free. Even though pure open source might not be their focus, I have a hard time condemning them for providing great, free products.

(I'm not affiliated with Musescore or their company. I'm just a happy user of both Audacity and Musescore, both of which are the only truly competitive free products in their respective domains.)

Re: How We Made MuseScore 4 [video]

#22

Post by WhrRTheBaboons »

kzrdude wrote: post #13

MuseScore has been transformed in recent versions. Great strides in quality while simultaneously turning away from being community-owned, that's at least the feeling I get. Musescore is now hard to install, distributions don't carry builds of it. It's now only distributed as snap, flatpak and appimage. It now integrates with commercial services, etc. That's just a characterization of what it looks like from the linux…

that was always the vibe I got from Tantacrul’s videos. He does his best not to delve into it but the writing was on the wall from the start.

Re: How We Made MuseScore 4 [video]

#23

Post by axus »

Gordonjcp wrote: post #7
tczMUFlmoNk wrote: post #3

I love this kind of behind-the-scenes, in-the-weeds video, and it's well done. Unfortunately, the incident with a Muse Group director openly blackmailing an open source developer [1] [2], threatening to have him deported to China while specifically calling out his public criticism of the CCP with a disgusting "who knows how he may be received"—well, to say that this incident leaves a bitter mark in my memory would be…

> threatening to have him deported to China while specifically calling out his public criticism of the CCP with a disgusting "who knows how he may be received" I think you're overstating it a bit. How about you tell the whole story?

That didn't happen.

And if it did, it wasn't that bad.

And if it was, that's not a big deal.

And if it is, that's not my fault.

And if it was, I didn't mean it.

And if I did, he deserved it.

Re: How We Made MuseScore 4 [video]

#24

Post by grotted »

While I love the UX improvements, MuseScore 4 is unusably laggy. On every machine I’ve tried, it takes 10+ seconds to respond after a few phrases have been entered.

I was hoping they just rushed out a buggy release, but there’s been no improvement since then. When folks complain about it on the subreddit or forums, Muse Group just brushes them off.

I’ve used Musescore for a long time, and I happily would’ve put up with moderate bugs for a contemporary UX. But unfortunately, 4.0/4.1 is completely broken for me.

Re: How We Made MuseScore 4 [video]

#25

Post by psd1 »

nunuvit wrote: post #19
notpushkin wrote: post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the fact that Daniel backpedaled and said his blackmail comment wasn't meant as blackmail doesn't really change anything.

It's not blackmail in the first place. There were no secrets to reveal since everything was published online, and it's legal to sue and report a possible crime. Speculating about the consequences doesn't make it blackmail.

The vast majority of neurotypical English-speaking adults would have no difficulty categorising it as a veiled threat. Note the strong consensus in this comments section.

The message has two parts - the response that X wants from Y, and the possible negative consequences for Y. The proximity of the two parts makes the implied link clear (to most people, anyway).

I assure you that 99% of judges and prosecutors would recognise this as blackmail (modulo variance in different countries' legal definitions of the crime).

Re: How We Made MuseScore 4 [video]

#26

Post by [deleted] »

tczMUFlmoNk wrote: post #3

I love this kind of behind-the-scenes, in-the-weeds video, and it's well done. Unfortunately, the incident with a Muse Group director openly blackmailing an open source developer [1] [2], threatening to have him deported to China while specifically calling out his public criticism of the CCP with a disgusting "who knows how he may be received"—well, to say that this incident leaves a bitter mark in my memory would be…

[deleted]

Re: How We Made MuseScore 4 [video]

#28

Post by junon »

Hamcha wrote: post #15
junon wrote: post #10

Ah yes, after giving the middle finger to the entire open source community after you bought Audacity - only after screwing over the original userbase of MuseScore. Tantacrul is a black mark on the FOSS community. Strong words, yes.

I'm not saying he's an angel but has Tantacrul ever said that FOSS was his focus? He's a composer and UX designer with a prior job in Microsoft, the fact that the tools he gets to work now are open source seems happenstance more than a deliberate choice. He was critical of existing music notation software and now works on one. He probably enjoys that the open nature of Muse Group lets him be pretty transparent about…

It doesn't matter, don't buy a super popular and well established open source project and then stuff it full of spyware.

Re: How We Made MuseScore 4 [video]

#29

Post by Hamcha »

junon wrote: post #28
Hamcha wrote: post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not saying he's an angel but has Tantacrul ever said that FOSS was his focus? He's a composer and UX designer with a prior job in Microsoft, the fact that the tools he gets to work now are open source seems happenstance more than a deliberate choice. He was critical of existing music notation software and now works on one. He probably enjoys that the open nature of Muse Group lets him be pretty transparent about…

It doesn't matter, don't buy a super popular and well established open source project and then stuff it full of spyware.

I still think this is way off-topic and not related to Tantacrul or his content (and rather, his employer). But why are you blaming Muse Group for everything and not the Audacity devs?

Wouldn't they be the black mark of the FOSS community for accepting money from a known bad entity? I also think this is discounting a big problem in the FOSS community, volunteers giving years of their free time on passion projects while dealing with angry users and not getting one cent out of it.

I routinely see people bitching about OBS and its devs for not being utterly perfect for their setup because they forget that once upon a time XSplit used to be the only good option. How much have they paid for OBS? zero. If company X comes and says "hey I can actually give you a living wage to work on your passion project" I think it's in some case reasonable to see their loyalty to whiny end users to be quite fragile.

Re: How We Made MuseScore 4 [video]

#30

Post by junon »

Hamcha wrote: post #29
junon wrote: post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It doesn't matter, don't buy a super popular and well established open source project and then stuff it full of spyware.

I still think this is way off-topic and not related to Tantacrul or his content (and rather, his employer). But why are you blaming Muse Group for everything and not the Audacity devs? Wouldn't they be the black mark of the FOSS community for accepting money from a known bad entity? I also think this is discounting a big problem in the FOSS community, volunteers giving years of their free time on passion projects whi…

Because Tantacrul was the main person on GitHub telling people they're wrong for being upset.

The audacity devs all left. What was left were a few unknown, unvetted developers from a state known to employ extensive surveillance against users, quietly putting Google Analytics into FOSS software without asking the community.

Tantacrul was present, active, and patronizing throughout the entire ordeal.

Post reply on HN