I've seen lots of long prompt suggestions, however single words are fascinating, some words are extremely heavy, for example, we might assume 'topic' and 'subject' are somewhat interchangeable, but when I'm talking to an LLM swapping those words cause a huge change. Same with names, if you ask it to act like Dave, it's not some random personality, it's a distillation of every Dave it has encountered! I don't know how…
These are the Daves I know: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8nvzEqsZIGo
The Lone Banana Problem in AI
21–30 of 109 posts
Re: The Lone Banana Problem in AI
#22I wish this article was just 3 paragraphs. The verbose writing style was a little tiring, I found myself scrolling impatiently to find what the actual "Lone Banana Problem" was.
My preferred format would probably be:
- answer to the title / synopsis
- the article, without ads, using the site’s style
Re: The Lone Banana Problem in AI
#23Re: The Lone Banana Problem in AI
#24I've seen lots of long prompt suggestions, however single words are fascinating, some words are extremely heavy, for example, we might assume 'topic' and 'subject' are somewhat interchangeable, but when I'm talking to an LLM swapping those words cause a huge change. Same with names, if you ask it to act like Dave, it's not some random personality, it's a distillation of every Dave it has encountered! I don't know how…
Re: The Lone Banana Problem in AI
#25These models have a tendency to move towards the average, especially if unprompted. As we see here, sometimes even if prompted otherwise.
They just have to get better or need a more precise interface like the —no :). We also couldn't have "a man crawling" before and now we can: https://i.imgur.com/ycVpk3i.jpeg
Re: The Lone Banana Problem in AI
#26Humans are in the business of consuming bananas, whereas neural nets are in the business of peddling bananas. They don't get to actually use these bananas so they can't gain deeper insight into what's they for. This is the classic lamb vs. mutton issue. Wealthy land owners who use one set of idioms vs. servants who use a different one. Happens to neural nets on human chassis as well.
Maybe the popular sci-fi image of "artificial brains" with humanoid bodies actually turns out to be more accurate than the technical view that robotics and artificial intelligence are mostly separate fields!
What if, instead of machine learning being a source of features we can maybe later build into robots, it's the other way round? What if direct interaction with the real world through robotic limbs and sensors turns out to be what it takes to get AI to stop hallucinating?
What if, furthermore, having a body turns out to be an essential requirement for AI to develop a sense of self? Not just because of sensory feedback, but simply because it provides an anchor point for identity?
Re: The Lone Banana Problem in AI
#27Again, there is a lot of words to describe the fact that machine learning is just lossy compression for a bunch of data with the possibility to interpolate between data points and get somewhat plausible results. This means data points may get lost during compression/training, and certain things will look off, whether it be a preference for banana pairs, even numbers of fingers or certain weasel words in verbiage.
Re: The Lone Banana Problem in AI
#28I wish this article was just 3 paragraphs. The verbose writing style was a little tiring, I found myself scrolling impatiently to find what the actual "Lone Banana Problem" was.
They told me what the problem was in about 2 seconds, and frankly, the title and the first sentence alone were.
All right, I concede, a blind reader would not know, but most people are not blind.
Re: The Lone Banana Problem in AI
#29You can get them standing side by side wearing trenchcoats. You can get a cat pyramid or a cat totem or a stack or tower of cats (though often the ability to count to three is then lost). You can't get them to share the trenchcoat. Nothing like that occurred in any training set, and the AIs do not understand spatial relationships between objects ("X is on top of Y, inside Z") so you cannot describe how to arrange the things it does know about in the scene. Dall-E won't do it. Midjourney won't do it. Stable Diffusion won't do it.
Eventually, enough images will be seeded into the training sets for this to stop being a useful test. But right now, it gives one a fascinating window on what happens when you try to extrapolate outside the cloud of thingspace described by the training data, rather than just interpolating within it.
Re: The Lone Banana Problem in AI
#30How is this at all whatsoever needed