Live data from Hacker News

A messaging app startup that raised $200M shuts down afters users were 95% fake

fortune.com

21–30 of 252 posts

Re: A messaging app startup that raised $200M shuts down afters users were 95% fake

#21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Without a phone number how do you prevent abuse and spam?

I can pick up PAYG Sims for verifying for essentially nothing (I think the cheapest I've seen here is 10p). A phone number proves, and stops nothing. If you can't detect spam from either the message, the volume or from other users reporting, then you have bigger problems.

But you can’t automate that trivially

Re: A messaging app startup that raised $200M shuts down afters users were 95% fake

#22
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It raises the cost for any spammer, including determined actors. More code, more complexity, plus the cost to actually rent the numbers. A lot of tech bros need to touch grass and realize that the rest of the world doesn’t mind giving their phone number to a chat app.

> More code, more complexity, plus the cost to actually rent the numbers Not a big deal, there's sms verification services, they have APIs and premade libraries, cost is about ~$0.06/verification depending on which service you use, and less with bulk discounts.

And spoiler: you can’t use those for spam.

Re: A messaging app startup that raised $200M shuts down afters users were 95% fake

#23

Are softbank actually the biggest idiots in VC? It almost seems like everything they invest in is a handshake deal built on "just trust me bro" numbers.

someone sure is

>Masayoshi Son. He had for many years the distinction of being the person who had lost the most money in history (more than $59bn[38] during the dot com crash of 2000 alone, when his SoftBank shares plummeted),[39] a feat surpassed by Elon Musk[40][41][42] in the following decades.

Re: A messaging app startup that raised $200M shuts down afters users were 95% fake

#24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It raises the cost for any spammer, including determined actors. More code, more complexity, plus the cost to actually rent the numbers. A lot of tech bros need to touch grass and realize that the rest of the world doesn’t mind giving their phone number to a chat app.

There are scenarios, such as communicating with my children, where someone doesn't have a phone number. Hangouts worked great until Google got bored and trashed it with Duo/whatever the other one was, that's all I was saying.

Google talk worked great until Google got bored and trashed it with Hangouts which worked less great until Google got bored and trashed it with Duo.

The sad part of it all ... Google Talk - by orders of magnitude their best chat offering was just xmpp/jabber the whole time.

Re: A messaging app startup that raised $200M shuts down afters users were 95% fake

#25
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Without a phone number how do you prevent abuse and spam?

You can purchase access to phone numbers for the purposes of verifying accounts. While phone numbers are a method to prevent easy sybil attacks, it is not effective when dealing with a determined actor.

It's not perfect. I've gotten accounts suspended from phone verification services. I don't want to share numbers with spammers and drug dealers for this reason.

Re: A messaging app startup that raised $200M shuts down afters users were 95% fake

#26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can pick up PAYG Sims for verifying for essentially nothing (I think the cheapest I've seen here is 10p). A phone number proves, and stops nothing. If you can't detect spam from either the message, the volume or from other users reporting, then you have bigger problems.

But you can’t automate that trivially

If I wanted to automate I would use a bulk VoIP service.

You are focussing on the wrong point, I only mentioned that because I could get on these services with a disposable number.

Re: A messaging app startup that raised $200M shuts down afters users were 95% fake

#28
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can purchase access to phone numbers for the purposes of verifying accounts. While phone numbers are a method to prevent easy sybil attacks, it is not effective when dealing with a determined actor.

It raises the cost for any spammer, including determined actors. More code, more complexity, plus the cost to actually rent the numbers. A lot of tech bros need to touch grass and realize that the rest of the world doesn’t mind giving their phone number to a chat app.

People shouldn’t be expected to give up their privacy and anonymity and put themselves at greater risk of identity theft because big tech can’t be bothered figuring out a different way to solve spam.

Just because the rest of the world doesn’t mind giving out their phone number, it doesn’t mean it’s harmless. I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to get sim swapped and have all of my bank accounts drained because some random company with zero security measures demands I provide my phone number to use their app.

Re: A messaging app startup that raised $200M shuts down afters users were 95% fake

#30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Only one of those doesn't require your phone number. It'll be nice when we get to the point where we can have a proper working chat app that doesn't require one. Hangouts used to be great but Google has to always make sure their chat doesn't work.

Without a phone number how do you prevent abuse and spam?

My phone number itself gets a lot of spam.
Post reply on HN