Earlier quoted context omitted.
Be more specific about why Zed's post is "damning".
He accuses DHH of lying, and refers to an earlier (AFAIK uncontested) recording of the conversation to demonstrate his point. Edit: I agree 100% with jm4's elaboration down below.
Zed Shaw responds to DHH's Ruby Myths
21–30 of 61 posts
Re: Zed Shaw responds to DHH's Ruby Myths
#22"Mom, DHH called me a stupid-head!" "Did not!" "Did so!" ... Etc., etc. Honestly, neither of these guys need us feeding their egos. They've contributed some decent infrastructure for web hacking, but if they want to have a he-said/she-said argument, that's their business. I personally don't want to waste any more time on their little ego-fest. Let's turn this into a thread about Passenger, instead, since both of them…
Also I want to say Zed was very helpful debugging problems when we were using Mongrel in the early days and I appreciate his contributions.
Re: Zed Shaw responds to DHH's Ruby Myths
#23I've noticed a pattern emerging in the Ruby community. Everyone thinks everyone else "needs help". Zed "needs help". Zed's friend "might need help". The reason I think this is interesting, though, is because this behavior apparently rubs off on Rails users. I know someone who switched from Perl to Ruby (on Rails) a while back. He came back to the Perl community by writing his own super-great web framework. When anyon…
Now, that was a cheap shot.
Re: Zed Shaw responds to DHH's Ruby Myths
#24Wow! Zed's story is consistent and potentially damning. I look forward to DHH's reply.
"But still an inconvenience, naturally. Nobody likes a memory leak. So I was happy when a patch emerged that fixed it and we could stop doing that. I believe the fix appeared some time in 2006. So even when Zed published his implosion at the end of 2007, this was already ancient history."
I assumed the patch he referred to was for Rails, not Mongrel. And why would Zed make such a big deal about this in the first place if it were his own software's fault?
Re: Zed Shaw responds to DHH's Ruby Myths
#25"Normally I wouldn’t give a shit. Ruby on Rails is so far from my world right now that I don’t even really care. I play guitar and write with maybe some coding to pay the bills and that’s about it."
Man, Zed's too cool for Rails. He plays guitar. He doesn't care what those Rails people think. But let him post this one long rant to "clear something up"...
Re: Zed Shaw responds to DHH's Ruby Myths
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
Zed may very well be paranoid, hyper-aggressive and caustic. However, you can be paranoid and on to something. The subtle forms of aggression that Zed accuses the Rails core of perpetuating are difficult to provide concrete examples for, and it seems as though he has done just in this case.. we will see how it plays out. It impacts me as a developer because this potentially diminishes DHH's credibility in my eyes, an…
I believe the phrase you're looking for is: Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean people aren't out to get you.
Re: Zed Shaw responds to DHH's Ruby Myths
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
Zed may very well be paranoid, hyper-aggressive and caustic. However, you can be paranoid and on to something. The subtle forms of aggression that Zed accuses the Rails core of perpetuating are difficult to provide concrete examples for, and it seems as though he has done just in this case.. we will see how it plays out. It impacts me as a developer because this potentially diminishes DHH's credibility in my eyes, an…
It impacts me as a developer because this potentially diminishes DHH's credibility in my eyes, and as the Rails BDFL, this has the potential to impact how I approach the platform I use to make a living. Well, all the code is available, right? You should base your decisions on the design and implementation of Rails, not on one of the author's blog. This is a really scary pattern emerging that I've noticed. It seems li…
The blog post comment that you refer to seems to reflect a poor thought process. However, mine has a little more reasoning behind it.
Re: Zed Shaw responds to DHH's Ruby Myths
#28Re: Zed Shaw responds to DHH's Ruby Myths
#29It's as easy to use as Rails, plus has no such toxic people hanging around it.
Re: Zed Shaw responds to DHH's Ruby Myths
#30I did not read DHH's post and think he was suggesting Mongrel was leaking. I see that DHH screwed up and said Mongrel (which they were using in production, just not on Basecamp) when he should have said FCGI. But Zed has taken an entire DHH post, zoomed in on one irrelevant error, and attempted to twist the entire discussion around it. Let's settle it now: * Mongrel wasn't leaking. * DHH clearly appears to have missp…
Zed may very well be paranoid, hyper-aggressive and caustic. However, you can be paranoid and on to something. The subtle forms of aggression that Zed accuses the Rails core of perpetuating are difficult to provide concrete examples for, and it seems as though he has done just in this case.. we will see how it plays out. It impacts me as a developer because this potentially diminishes DHH's credibility in my eyes, an…