Why is it monolithic? Why not microkernel? Especially that all the typical jobs of an operating system are outsourced.
Strictly speaking, a monolithic kernel is one which builds in all the code to operate: talk to hardware, load programs, perform its services or even include the ability to load drivers/code to talk to other hardware. All of the key functionality is loaded into the kernel program space but that is usually separate from user space or process space. Dumb programs; smart kernel. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monolithic_k…
A typical microkernel will have user programs that drive the hardware that expose a very similar interface to what a macrokernel would provide, from the application level there isn't a whole lot of visible difference but at the system level there is, essentially the macrokernel is broken up into a number of separate processes each of which is fashioned as a 'normal' user program. This significantly reduces the scope of the kernel itself which has a whole pile of interesting implications which usually manifest as massive reliability improvements over macro kernels, a penalty in raw io throughput and the ability to elegantly (on the fly) load and unload all kinds of OS components without the need to reboot the system.
But there usually is a clear distinction between such 'kernel processes' and user applications, they also tend to be run at a slightly higher priority to ensure that the system keeps moving.