Live data from Hacker News

I downloaded all 1.6M posts on Bluesky

worthdoingbadly.com

21–30 of 294 posts

Re: I downloaded all 1.6M posts on Bluesky

#21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Maybe it's anti-Elon, or maybe it's anti-the-things-Elon-is-doing-to-Twitter. Just because the people who like Elon have joined a cult of personality doesn't mean the people who dislike what he's done to Twitter have done the same. For example, I still think Tesla's are cool cars and Space X is doing exciting things. For me, Twitter has become absolutely unusable. Every person on my FYP and in the replies is someone…

[flagged]

Re: I downloaded all 1.6M posts on Bluesky

#22
I would just like to say that I am excited for Bluesky to exist. It might go poorly, but I'm unwilling to write off weird attempts at innovation before the technology has had a chance to evolve in the wild.

I've seen several posts lately that have made me feel like the HN sentiment towards Bluesky is negative. Throwing them under the bus for the domain validation mistake. Hatred at commercialization of a protocol. Questioning why Bluesky would do anything but become a worse Twitter since Jack Dorsey is at the helm.

C'mon! At least give it the benefit of doubt while in beta! I, for one, frequently lament how fragmented my IM programs have become. I felt like there was an ideal point where Pidgin + XMPP interfaced with everything and we've slowly walked away from that high water mark. So, approaching communication at the protcol level has a certain appeal. I get the reasoning behind the goal.

Do I have concerns that this is another attempt at building a walled garden around something I wish to be open and interoperable? Of course! Do I think it's a net negative on society for someone to be making their attempt? No! Bring on the new tech!

I wish I had a more nuanced argument to make my case because I'm sure there will be tons of replies here telling me why my opinion is bad and I'll be unable to refute them. And those responses will likely make very fair points, but oh well! I needed to at least try to throw some optimism about technology into the HackerNews foray.

Re: I downloaded all 1.6M posts on Bluesky

#26

I would just like to say that I am excited for Bluesky to exist. It might go poorly, but I'm unwilling to write off weird attempts at innovation before the technology has had a chance to evolve in the wild. I've seen several posts lately that have made me feel like the HN sentiment towards Bluesky is negative. Throwing them under the bus for the domain validation mistake. Hatred at commercialization of a protocol. Qu…

[flagged]

Re: I downloaded all 1.6M posts on Bluesky

#27
post #23
post #16

Is there such a thing as private posts? or “friends only” posts or something? Or is it all public?

All public. There aren't even DMs. No private accounts either. I think some kind of private communication is on the roadmap.

Is there even a notion of “friends”? or is it more like Twitter where you only follow others who may follow you back

Re: I downloaded all 1.6M posts on Bluesky

#28

Bluesky is absurd in both its small village feel and the breadth of people who post there and you can interact with. It's the same vibe as very early clubhouse. Broke artists next to philanthropists.

All invite-only early-access things that get hot are like it; once they go to general availability they go to shit, it seems.

Re: I downloaded all 1.6M posts on Bluesky

#29
post #4

The fact that someone can download all posts on a social network tells you how little usage it has attracted.

Even on large platforms you can (technically) download all posts. Might take some time and you might need to cycle some storage, but it's doable. So I don't really think that's a great metric to observe usage.

Ignoring that judging usage based on a still invite only platform is also a little silly.

Re: I downloaded all 1.6M posts on Bluesky

#30
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

All public. There aren't even DMs. No private accounts either. I think some kind of private communication is on the roadmap.

Is there even a notion of “friends”? or is it more like Twitter where you only follow others who may follow you back

No "friends", only follows and followers like Twitter.
Post reply on HN