The response, while brief, lines up with my read of the transcript:
The oral argument in the Supreme Court case Tyler v. Hennepin County indicated that the justices were likely to rule in favor of the homeowner's property rights.
Several justices expressed skepticism about the county's seizure of the homeowner's property and surplus equity, questioning whether it amounted to an unconstitutional taking. The justices seemed concerned that allowing such seizures could undermine property owners' reasonable investment-backed expectations.
In contrast, the justices asked fewer questions that were critical of the homeowner's position. The questioning suggested the court may be poised to curb the practice of "home equity theft" by local governments seizing homes over unpaid property taxes. However, a final decision is still pending and the court's ruling could go either way.