Live data from Hacker News

A thief who stole 106 rare clocks

smithsonianmag.com

21–30 of 61 posts

Re: A thief who stole 106 rare clocks

#26

A man with one clock always knows what time it is. A man with two clocks is never sure. We have no data on a man with 106 clocks.

A man with 106 clocks can be sqrt(106) times more confident in knowing what time it is.

Why sqrt? The ensemble is 1-P(Wrong time probability for a single clock)^106

Re: A thief who stole 106 rare clocks

#27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A man with 106 clocks can be sqrt(106) times more confident in knowing what time it is.

Why sqrt? The ensemble is 1-P(Wrong time probability for a single clock)^106

Every clock is wrong; they're just wrong by different amounts.

Re: A thief who stole 106 rare clocks

#29
post #13

A man with one clock always knows what time it is. A man with two clocks is never sure. We have no data on a man with 106 clocks.

If even a portion of them chime the hour: the man is insane.

Me: patiently explaining how I, a 106 clocks enthusiast, havent stolen any clocks, to the authorities at my door to no avail as the roaring cacophany of time clangs bangs and bongs behind me.

My deafened cat: groaning in agony

My wristwatch: absent you fool please set in and let me educate you a poor plebian on the 106 clocks lifestyle....

Re: A thief who stole 106 rare clocks

#30

A man with one clock always knows what time it is. A man with two clocks is never sure. We have no data on a man with 106 clocks.

Unless you're Doctor Emmet Brown. Also, Mr Pedantic is curious of your definition of a clock. If you are limiting it to just analog clocks with manual only adjustments sure, it might be hard to keep them in sync. But I'm willing to think that all of those reading this thread have clocks in sync
Post reply on HN