Here's the first four images... ready for parsing by your program: :::: image 1, left: s-tac-toe equals minus-dot seven ex comma slash-slash-backslash gamma capital-l lower-j ex slash :::: image 1, right, downward capital-t capital-i equals four parallel-lines slash-slash-backslash equals-slash comma s-tac-toe slash-slash-backslash slash-slash-backslash-backslash comma :::: image 1, left, upper capital-l divided-by c…
Here's a frequency chart of the first 3 images: (23, 'comma') (10, 'capital-i') (8, 'slash-slash') (7, 'divided-by') (7, 'capital-l') (6, 'ex') (5, 'slash-slash-backslash-backslash') (5, 'slash-slash-backslash') (5, 'equals') (3, 'plus') (3, 'minus-dot') (3, 'equivalent') (3, '11-over-1') (2, 'zee') (2, 'vertical-line') (2, 'three-peaks') (2, 'slash-backslash-backslash') (2, 'slash') (2, 's-tac-toe') (2, 'minus') (2,…
History PhD Student Reaches out to Cryptographers to Help Break a Civil War Code
21–23 of 23 posts
Re: History PhD Student Reaches out to Cryptographers to Help Break a Civil War Code
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
Here's a frequency chart of the first 3 images: (23, 'comma') (10, 'capital-i') (8, 'slash-slash') (7, 'divided-by') (7, 'capital-l') (6, 'ex') (5, 'slash-slash-backslash-backslash') (5, 'slash-slash-backslash') (5, 'equals') (3, 'plus') (3, 'minus-dot') (3, 'equivalent') (3, '11-over-1') (2, 'zee') (2, 'vertical-line') (2, 'three-peaks') (2, 'slash-backslash-backslash') (2, 'slash') (2, 's-tac-toe') (2, 'minus') (2,…
There are definitely more symbols then there are letters in the alphabet. So that could mean he has multiple ciphers or that some symbols are substitutes for words, possibly common phrases.
Additionally, it's possible that some of these characters aren't characters at all, but common repetitions. I'm thinking particularly of those slashes and backslashes.
Re: History PhD Student Reaches out to Cryptographers to Help Break a Civil War Code
#23Here's the first four images... ready for parsing by your program: :::: image 1, left: s-tac-toe equals minus-dot seven ex comma slash-slash-backslash gamma capital-l lower-j ex slash :::: image 1, right, downward capital-t capital-i equals four parallel-lines slash-slash-backslash equals-slash comma s-tac-toe slash-slash-backslash slash-slash-backslash-backslash comma :::: image 1, left, upper capital-l divided-by c…
Here's a frequency chart of the first 3 images: (23, 'comma') (10, 'capital-i') (8, 'slash-slash') (7, 'divided-by') (7, 'capital-l') (6, 'ex') (5, 'slash-slash-backslash-backslash') (5, 'slash-slash-backslash') (5, 'equals') (3, 'plus') (3, 'minus-dot') (3, 'equivalent') (3, '11-over-1') (2, 'zee') (2, 'vertical-line') (2, 'three-peaks') (2, 'slash-backslash-backslash') (2, 'slash') (2, 's-tac-toe') (2, 'minus') (2,…
The comma symbol is more frequent than any letter usually is in English, but given the small corpus that's not too telling. It could stand for an 'e', or the coded text could be lists and they're just commas.
Someone commented on the article that he suspects the 'divided by' symbol might stand for 'i' due to its placement, which agrees roughly with the position it gets in the frequency table. Someone else has suggested that the language being masked might not be english, which is an intriguing possibility.
The frequencies aren't flat, which seems to suggest it's either not a very good homophonic cipher (he just threw some odd replacments and codeword-symbols in there, basically still a substitution cipher) or it's a very good one (he consciously aimed at misleading symbol frequencies).
The rough nature of the writing (also discussed on the article) suggests that the code was probably memorised, and thus not the result of a very laborous method.