21–26 of 26 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
More like a race to the top: you're forgetting all the applications that will be built on top of these open source models.
I'm not so sure. Does anyone pay for pytorch, numpy, tensorflow? In the matter of weeks we've seen llama.cpp, alpaca.cpp released to the public. Barrier to entry in this market is quickly going to zero.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
More like a race to the top: you're forgetting all the applications that will be built on top of these open source models.
I'm not so sure. Does anyone pay for pytorch, numpy, tensorflow? In the matter of weeks we've seen llama.cpp, alpaca.cpp released to the public. Barrier to entry in this market is quickly going to zero.
The article says "now in the wild after being leaked" but then it says "the data is impossible to retrieve as it is now stored on the servers belonging to OpenAI." So did the source code leak out of OpenAI into the wild, or are they saying that OpenAI itself is "the wild"? As far as I see from the article, it's not accessible to the general public.
The second one. OpenAI is now in possession of Samsung trade secrets. To Samsung, that's "in the wild". And that's a reasonable viewpoint - OpenAI could easily leak chat logs, overfit future models on this data etc, and there's nothing Samsung can now do about it.
How did they gain access to ChatGPT from their offices? I worked in the ATX factory about a decade ago and the network was very locked-down at the time. You can't even get your phone into the building without a security guard doing things to it. Taking basic stuff like paper in/out is also disallowed. I would have expected a total ban on personal computing devices leaving the parking lot if this happened during my ti…
>> The company allowed engineers at its semiconductor arm to use the AI writer to help fix problems with their source code.
This is exactly why Wall St. and the major banks have banned their employees using ChatGPT [0] [1] [2]. It is called regulation and compliance. Some companies drinking the AI koolaid just seem to love learning the hard way. [0] https://www.wsj.com/articles/jpmorgan-restricts-employees-fr... [1] https://tech.co/news/wall-street-banks-ban-ai-chatgpt [2] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-02-24/citigroup...
For what its worth, this is only via the ChatGPT interface. Their terms of service state that API calls are not processed in the same manner for review and are deleted after 30 days. I suppose these companies can build their own, in-house, Chat application.
OpenAI should be worried and self regulate before the gov’t steps in and does it for them.