Live data from Hacker News

Twitch.tv Lays of 400 Employees

blog.twitch.tv

21–30 of 240 posts

Re: Twitch.tv Lays of 400 Employees

#21
post #7
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The "macroeconomic environment" is the evaporation of available VC funding because higher interest rates provide more lucrative investments elsewhere.

But Twitch is owned by Amazon? They don't need VCs?

The users that use and pay Twitch do? (Not VC but capital in general)

Re: Twitch.tv Lays of 400 Employees

#22
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don’t understand how this is affecting AMZN’s cash flow though. Seems like both their costs and revenues would scale similarly with inflationary effects, leaving a similar profit margin %.

Once you realize that sometime in the past 10-20 years the economy started having nothing to do with actual goods and services and instead turned into some sort of weird game played by the powerful and the rich it makes more sense. Personally I peg it happening sometime around 2008 when it became clear the rules didn't matter, consequences were for the poor and party hearty. Explain how else a company like Uber that…

VCs want to capture markets. That's why they pour money into launching what could be the next market leader, even if the model won't work at predatory prices. Because once they own the market they can raise the prices to whatever they want.

Re: Twitch.tv Lays of 400 Employees

#25
post #6
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The "macroeconomic environment" is the evaporation of available VC funding because higher interest rates provide more lucrative investments elsewhere.

Why would Amazon (owner of twitch) care about that? They have tons of cash and revenues are still quite strong. AMZN isn’t looking for VC funding, they are the whale. Net income is hard to judge — yes it’s down but not only is Amazon famous for reinvesting all profits and claiming $0 of net earnings, but they’ve also been writing off a lot of one time charges for severances related to these layoffs.

Amazon (like every other big company) has raised billions with bonds that they will eventually need to refinance at higher rates.

Re: Twitch.tv Lays of 400 Employees

#26
post #9
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The macroeconomic trend is 'the stock price went down because the fed stopped printing money'.

I don’t understand how this is affecting AMZN’s cash flow though. Seems like both their costs and revenues would scale similarly with inflationary effects, leaving a similar profit margin %.

I don't know, so I'll offer a plausible, to me, story: Consider that AWS is Amazon's income [0]. VC funded companies may well be a significant portion of its customer base. Hence, if its customers are tightening their belts, they may take short and long term measures to limit their spend on AWS. Amazon presumably prepares for this by lowering twitch's budget.

[0] https://www.investopedia.com/how-amazon-makes-money-4587523

Re: Twitch.tv Lays of 400 Employees

#27
post #7
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The "macroeconomic environment" is the evaporation of available VC funding because higher interest rates provide more lucrative investments elsewhere.

But Twitch is owned by Amazon? They don't need VCs?

Their source of revenue (i.e. advertisers) are often startups and DTC brands that were kept alive by VC money.

Re: Twitch.tv Lays of 400 Employees

#30
post #14
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would Amazon (owner of twitch) care about that? They have tons of cash and revenues are still quite strong. AMZN isn’t looking for VC funding, they are the whale. Net income is hard to judge — yes it’s down but not only is Amazon famous for reinvesting all profits and claiming $0 of net earnings, but they’ve also been writing off a lot of one time charges for severances related to these layoffs.

Because their income comes from advertising. Because the economy sucks in general, companies in all industries are being more careful with where they spend their marketing budget. You can see this reflected in the revenue of other advertising companies as well such as google and meta.

https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/GOOG/alphabet/reve...

https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/META/meta-platform...

Is it?

Post reply on HN