21–30 of 71 posts
Adding fluff, euphemisms, and indirection is disrespectful to the people affected.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Still 100x better than the average person!
I read the Wikipedia article about Scansion and I still don't understand it.
The comment is referring to GPT's ability to scan and analyze the meter or rhythm of poetry. Scansion is the process of analyzing the poetic meter by marking the stressed and unstressed syllables in each line.
The comment implies that there were two instances where GPT failed to accurately analyze the meter of two different poems in a single day. This may suggest that GPT is not proficient in scanning poetry or that it may not be the best tool for analyzing the meter of poetic works.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Still 100x better than the average person!
I read the Wikipedia article about Scansion and I still don't understand it.
That exact sentance structure/motif shows up in just about all fictional chatgpt outputs. I've played with fiction a lot in chatgpt, and it's so annoying.
The most interesting part of this is that ChatGPT can create content with more "whimsy" and "humanity" than many tech leaders. IMO The purpose of such announcements is to maintain the leadership (willing followership) role by reconnecting with followers with a hard-to-fake heart-to-heart. Without this, the warmth is gone. Followership becomes cold and is based primarily on health insurance, salary, visa, greencard, e…
I would have liked to see the KJV.