Live data from Hacker News

PostgreSQL 14 Internals

postgrespro.com

21–25 of 25 posts

Re: PostgreSQL 14 Internals

#21
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Me too! I don't see it on Amazon yet.

Ditch Amazon. Support independent publishers/bookstores.

That's not an argument, that's a command.

Why support indie publishers / stores?

(I already dislike Amazon and don't use it for anything at all, I'd just like to hear your argument)

Re: PostgreSQL 14 Internals

#22
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ditch Amazon. Support independent publishers/bookstores.

That's not an argument, that's a command. Why support indie publishers / stores? (I already dislike Amazon and don't use it for anything at all, I'd just like to hear your argument)

Not everything has to be an argument. Most communication is not an argument.

Re: PostgreSQL 14 Internals

#23
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why print ? It's impossible to search.

Searching isn't a great way of actually retaining information. You get a very shallow understanding of the topic. Reading books cover to cover, at least when they're well written and not full of padding, is time much better spent. And when doing so, I too prefer the ergonomics of printed books.

Pretty crazy how not everyone seems to understand this.

Re: PostgreSQL 14 Internals

#24
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's not an argument, that's a command. Why support indie publishers / stores? (I already dislike Amazon and don't use it for anything at all, I'd just like to hear your argument)

Not everything has to be an argument. Most communication is not an argument.

You can't just command someone to do something and not explain why, otherwise, obviously, they're not going to follow the command.

The argument would be for the purpose of convincing me that the command has any merit, right? After all, I'm not employed by the guy who made the command and he's not a government officer, so why should I listen?

Re: PostgreSQL 14 Internals

#25
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not everything has to be an argument. Most communication is not an argument.

You can't just command someone to do something and not explain why, otherwise, obviously, they're not going to follow the command. The argument would be for the purpose of convincing me that the command has any merit, right? After all, I'm not employed by the guy who made the command and he's not a government officer, so why should I listen?

You can absolutely do that, just like you can also propose arguments that fail to persuade. I'm not claiming it's an effective way to spend one's time.
Post reply on HN