Live data from Hacker News

Twitter's Bootstrap 2 ready for testing and feedback

markdotto.com

21–30 of 87 posts

Re: Twitter's Bootstrap 2 ready for testing and feedback

#21
post #17
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The big one, for me at least, is the move from a 16-column grid to a 12-column grid. I didn't look into the technical differences, just those that would impact development with it. I just converted a ton of stuff (like last week ), so it's pretty fresh in my mind. I feel like I should have checked the wip branch first, but this has really become my favorite kit. I've been about 95% YUI and the remainder OOCSS, and Bo…

I found the dox from Aaron's comment (thanks, everyone!). Bootstrap 2 looks amazing. What's the win going from 16 to 12 columns?

Wondering the same. Sorry, didn't mean to imply it's a win. For me, I'm going to have to adjust a ton of layout. It's probably not all that bad if you've got a decent template structure, though.

It's a headache, but as I was saying, it's so much quicker to work with than many of the others that I might just dedicate some time to do the work and get on board.

Re: Twitter's Bootstrap 2 ready for testing and feedback

#24
post #17
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The big one, for me at least, is the move from a 16-column grid to a 12-column grid. I didn't look into the technical differences, just those that would impact development with it. I just converted a ton of stuff (like last week ), so it's pretty fresh in my mind. I feel like I should have checked the wip branch first, but this has really become my favorite kit. I've been about 95% YUI and the remainder OOCSS, and Bo…

I found the dox from Aaron's comment (thanks, everyone!). Bootstrap 2 looks amazing. What's the win going from 16 to 12 columns?

A 12-column grid lets you easily mix 3-colum and 4-column layouts. A 16-column grid does not.

[edit] Essentially it's more expressive. Another commenter correctly mentioned that it could have the same advantages above for a responsive design. 12-columns allow for greater freedom of expression at all display sizes.

Re: Twitter's Bootstrap 2 ready for testing and feedback

#27
post #17
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The big one, for me at least, is the move from a 16-column grid to a 12-column grid. I didn't look into the technical differences, just those that would impact development with it. I just converted a ton of stuff (like last week ), so it's pretty fresh in my mind. I feel like I should have checked the wip branch first, but this has really become my favorite kit. I've been about 95% YUI and the remainder OOCSS, and Bo…

I found the dox from Aaron's comment (thanks, everyone!). Bootstrap 2 looks amazing. What's the win going from 16 to 12 columns?

>What's the win going from 16 to 12 columns?

Was wondering that too. First thing that comes to mind is that 12 columnn is more flexible for responsive layouts, which is another big addition in v2.

For example, since 12 is divisible by 3, it's easier to create a responsive site with 3 vertical sections that collapse into a single vertical section on mobile devices. (Like the Less Framework's mobile layout: http://lessframework.com/. Not the best example, I know I've seen a better one, but can't find it atm, but that gives the general idea.).

Don't know for sure if that's the reason, though.

Re: Twitter's Bootstrap 2 ready for testing and feedback

#29
post #15

Does anyone know why LESS was picked over SASS for Bootstrap?

I don't know why, but if you are looking for SASS there is a fork: https://github.com/jlong/sass-twitter-bootstrap

I've been using https://github.com/thomas-mcdonald/bootstrap-sass/tree/2.0 for the last few days. I haven't encountered any problems.

A big thanks to Thomas if you read this, a gem is way nicer than converting it myself.

Post reply on HN