Live data from Hacker News

Nalanda University flourished for more than seven centuries

bbc.com

21–30 of 296 posts

Re: Nalanda University flourished for more than seven centuries

#21
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why wouldn’t Hindus have a country? Muslims got two in the partition.

What does my post have to do with Hindus having/not having a land of their own?

It seems extremely obvious if you just think for a second. Are you aware that British India was partitioned along ethno-religious lines? I’m a little shocked that you’re so confused…

Re: Nalanda University flourished for more than seven centuries

#22

9 million books and 10k students - Unrealistic.

Why? Books need not be unique books. There could be variations of the same book. For example, many books / scriptures were still being reconciled as recently as 100 years back and there are so many versions of ramayana available from one corner of Asia to another corner, that I would expect a respectable university to try to look at the variations and do some kind of lineage analysis. And also book may not imply a 1000 page book, it could also mean an 8 page manuscript.

Does 9 million sound big, sure? But in the absence of other information, maybe we can debate the quantum of overstatement rather than just assuming that since we can't explain it, everything related to it may be fake.

And last point, maybe there were 9 million books. What's a university if it does not have more than one book per student especially if they built that library over 700 years. Maybe each student had an annual journal which is classified as a book.

Re: Nalanda University flourished for more than seven centuries

#23
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is BBC following Hindu nationalist propaganda?

[flagged]

'could be' many things. :) But what centrists should do is research and allow research to happen. Not silence. rewriting history is not shameful.

Re: Nalanda University flourished for more than seven centuries

#24

Wait, so is this the oldest university then? Because a quick Google says "The Jagiellonian University is a public research university in Kraków, Poland. Founded in 1364 by King Casimir III the Great, it is the oldest university in Poland and the 13th oldest university in continuous operation in the world. It is regarded as Poland's most prestigious academic institution." Ugh... ChatGPT says "The University of Bologna…

You may have gotten it confused it for a recently created university by the same name. Just putting it out there.

https://nalandauniv.edu.in/

Re: Nalanda University flourished for more than seven centuries

#27
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you aware that there are many dozens of such countries?

Yes, hence the "should". Just because something exists doesn't mean it is always justified or sensible.

Who are you to judge them though? Seems like a colonizer’s attitude.

Re: Nalanda University flourished for more than seven centuries

#28
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, hence the "should". Just because something exists doesn't mean it is always justified or sensible.

Who are you to judge them though? Seems like a colonizer’s attitude.

I am not in a position to judge them. I am asking _you_ why you believe religion is a good basis to define a country.

Re: Nalanda University flourished for more than seven centuries

#29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It depends on how you define a university. Medieval European universities are often considered the first true universities, because they are direct ancestors of modern universities, and their traditions have survived and evolved into what we see today. There were earlier institutes of higher education all around the world (including Europe), but those traditions have not survived.

> It depends on how you define a university. I think the institution that invented the term probably gets to define it. And that is the University of Bologna.

So what's their definition?
Post reply on HN