Live data from Hacker News

What is Chess? What to think and for how long

alexcrompton.com

21–30 of 126 posts

Re: What is Chess? What to think and for how long

#21
post #13

Hijacking the comments to ask: what is the best way to get better at chess? (other than “just” playing matches, I’m already doing that)

* train various endgames (undervalued) (e.g. Naroditsky’s videos on endgames: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLT1F2nOxLHOfQI_hFiDnnWj4l... ) * puzzles for tactics & mates * learn 1 “easy to execute” opening for each color

also: go through your games with an engine and reflect on the good moves and blunders of yourself but also your opponent

Re: What is Chess? What to think and for how long

#23

Hijacking the comments to ask: what is the best way to get better at chess? (other than “just” playing matches, I’m already doing that)

Reached 1600 chess.com within a year starting from 600 and 2000 Lichess. What I believe to be more important is how you do something rather than what you do. What I mean is, someone can play many puzzles or games but if you are just blitzing out moves in puzzles even when you haven't calculated to a guaranteed advantage then you aren't learning anything. You are just exploiting what you have learnt over exploring by trying to look for patterns you wouldn't normally look for. Constantly even in complex positions people blitz out moves only to blunder.

This is why I don't recommend bullet to anyone.

Re: What is Chess? What to think and for how long

#24
post #2

"The ability to play chess is the sign of a gentleman. The ability to play chess well is the sign of a wasted life." Paul Murphy.

Seneca was of a similar opinion: It would be a lengthy business to mention all the different people who have spent their lives engaged in chess-playing or exercise with ball or the practice of roasting their bodies in the sun. They are not unoccupied when their pleasure form such a busy occupation. No one will doubt that those men are energetic triflers who devote their hours to the study of useless literature - On t…

That's weird, since chess didn't exist when Seneca was alive. Perhaps that's a mistranslation and he was referring to Ludus latrunculorum? [0]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludus_latrunculorum

Re: What is Chess? What to think and for how long

#25

Hijacking the comments to ask: what is the best way to get better at chess? (other than “just” playing matches, I’m already doing that)

Study and practicing openings. By this I mean you should memorise all the lines of an opening; not just the main lines. A vast majority of matches are won/lost within 30-35 moves by a few botched up opening moves. I don't recommend puzzles that much. They give you mental satisfaction. However, it is one thing to think of a good move knowing before hand that there's such a move possible but entirely different to recog…

Studying openings is a waste of time, even counterproductive, if you’re a beginner who hangs pieces all the time. This advice is much better suited to someone hoping to get over the 2k rating milestone. If you’re below 1k or even mid teens then your best bet is just to play a lot (longer time controls against better opponents) and study your games to look for your blunders, mistakes, and inaccuracies.

Re: What is Chess? What to think and for how long

#26
post #2

"The ability to play chess is the sign of a gentleman. The ability to play chess well is the sign of a wasted life." Paul Murphy.

Seneca was of a similar opinion: It would be a lengthy business to mention all the different people who have spent their lives engaged in chess-playing or exercise with ball or the practice of roasting their bodies in the sun. They are not unoccupied when their pleasure form such a busy occupation. No one will doubt that those men are energetic triflers who devote their hours to the study of useless literature - On t…

Considering that we don't have any history of chess until more than 500 years after Seneca's death, in India no less, I think it's fair to say that this is yet another example of "ye olde translationes" editorializing and using too much dynamic equivalence. latrunculi, the word he uses in this sentence at the beginning of chapter XIII, must have referred to a different game.

Plus, I doubt most people would really agree with de brevitate vitae. It's the equivalent of "grind culture" but from the first century. Amusing and interesting but probably not congruent with now most people want to spend their lives. (No shame from me if you do want to live your life that way, but it should just be known that this is far from a neutral perspective.) For a more balanced view of otium (pleasure, relaxation, opposite of negotium, business), I'd recommend the letters of Pliny the Younger.

Re: What is Chess? What to think and for how long

#27
post #7

Precise thought patterns, acronyms, X seconds per move... This seems like a terrible, robotic way to play chess, at least when it comes to having fun. I've played in excess of 100k games on lichess (mostly 3 minutes, some 5 minute and bullet too, no increments) with my ELO rating being ~2100 and I don't consciously do any of these (whether these or approximations of such still take place unconsciously is a different…

When you look at the board you are calculating moves though yes? You don't just think about puppies and ice cream cones I assume.

Re: What is Chess? What to think and for how long

#28
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reading this has made me realise that I am nowhere near as literate as I think I am.

I wouldn’t feel too bad; D&G are notoriously verbose and full of references to obscure topics.

This is also presumably a translation from the original French.

Re: What is Chess? What to think and for how long

#29

For mediocre chess players like me I recommend trying online speed chess for a few months. Bullet chess where each player gets a minute total clock is a completely different game where you move every half second on average. Aggressive playing is rewarded - as long as you get your opponent to waste time thinking. The quick play allows you develop a better sense of positioning, game flow, and end game tactics. When you…

No, in my experience it forms bad habits such as being severely prone to going for one turn attacks. One turn attacks may be the most common mistake among chess players. Anyone who has learnt to calculate deeper and look for nuances within a position will crush someone who only knows to go for time pressure.

Re: What is Chess? What to think and for how long

#30
post #17

I’ve always found Deleuze and Guattari’s comments on chess vs. go to be interesting. Some of the terminology might not make sense if you’re unfamiliar with their work, but I think you can get the general gist: Let us take a limited example and compare the war machine and the state apparatus in the context of the theory of games. Let us take chess and Go, from the standpoint of game pieces, the relations between the p…

Reading this has made me realise that I am nowhere near as literate as I think I am.

It really helps a lot if you know the game of go.
Post reply on HN