In what ways can we resist AI when our livelihoods (jobs) force us to use MS tools that are rapidly being integrated with ChatGPT?
We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it
21–30 of 425 posts
Re: We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it
#22I don't get the point of this article. ChatGPT and it's ilk are not going away. They are here, now, and our friends and families will start using them very soon. I have a contrarian view from this article that ChatGPT is actually good for the mainstream audience because it will teach them to think about how trust worthy the information is coming from a machine. Most people will understand they have to take what is be…
[deleted]
[deleted]
Re: We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it
#23I don't get the point of this article. ChatGPT and it's ilk are not going away. They are here, now, and our friends and families will start using them very soon. I have a contrarian view from this article that ChatGPT is actually good for the mainstream audience because it will teach them to think about how trust worthy the information is coming from a machine. Most people will understand they have to take what is be…
There's no cat and no bag - just statistical sleight of hand. The people playing the trick know this, and are just collecting investor dollars while they can (and astroturfing every HN article that explains what it is). Relying on the output of chatgpt is no different than doing a rain dance and expecting it to rain.
Re: We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it
#24Alternative title, “Precaritise, the drinking game.”
Re: We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it
#25In what ways can we resist AI when our livelihoods (jobs) force us to use MS tools that are rapidly being integrated with ChatGPT?
[deleted]
Re: We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it
#26[dead]
Re: We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it
#27Read this, it might change your mind on the usefulness of large language models: https://langchain.readthedocs.io/en/latest/modules/agents/ge...
[deleted]
Re: We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does TikTok, Android/Google,Instagram use make the same friends and family think about privacy and data? From a cursory look at...nearly everyone...i'd say the answer is a resounding no
When Facebook came around we all knew it would be a disaster, and it was. When TikTok/Instagram replaced it, we knew it would be worse, and it was. Now we have LLMs that vanishingly few people in the greater public actually understand and we know they'll be used for every possible evil imaginable at scale. I'm not optimistic. See you all in the hellish afterscape.
> When Facebook came around we all knew it would be a disaster, and it was.
Not really. When Facebook started as college exclusive social site it seem quite innocent. Later when it created news-feed, opened up to everyone etc it became a cesspool. Once people started getting their news from it, that's when it became dangerous.
Re: We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it
#29> If it produces plausible articles or computer code it means the inevitable hallucinations are becoming harder to spot. How functional does the code have to be before it's no longer a hallucination? What if we are all not much more than only drawing "on the (admittedly vast) proportion of [our experiences] ingested at training time?
[deleted]
Re: We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it
#30Bringing up that the AI model is racist or some other kind of -ist to bolster your argument is a bullshit tactic. People are -ists, too. I agree with the rest of their points, though.
[deleted]