21–30 of 535 posts
Link to court docket: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66577374/olohan-v-googl...
Not great for Google executives to be doing this.
Seems like no one believes him. Let's be honest: How often have you heard news about a woman molesting a man vs. a man molesting a woman?
> When he asked why he was non-inclusive, Olohan was told that he had shown favouritism towards high-performing employees I always expected capitalism to eat itself, but not like this... not like this.
This is one side of a two-sided story.
Seems like no one believes him. Let's be honest: How often have you heard news about a woman molesting a man vs. a man molesting a woman?
men victims have almost no statistics, because they are not collected
the absense of evidence is not the evidence of absence, this guy tried reporting it and the complaint was tossed in a dusty chamber like a chicago rape kit
Link to court docket: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66577374/olohan-v-googl...
> In or about June 2022, both Schiestel and Stewart strongly encouraged Olohan to hire only female applicants for an open management position on his team. Not great for Google executives to be doing this.
Obviously, the federal govt or the state of CA wouldn't support that approach if it were to make its way into a courtroom, but it's accepted as a "necessary evil" in the more elevated and sophisticated circles.
This specific comment is so annoying >Olohan said he reported the issue to Google’s human resources department the following week, but nothing ever came of the complaint. The HR rep “openly admitted … that if the complaint was ‘in reverse’ — a female accusing a white male of harassment — the complaint would certainly be escalated,” according to the lawsuit.
that is because HR exists to protect the company, not the employee. it would be a big media storm if that aforementioned reverse thing happened.
> When he asked why he was non-inclusive, Olohan was told that he had shown favouritism towards high-performing employees I always expected capitalism to eat itself, but not like this... not like this.
> In response to Olohan’s request during the call for specifics as to why Google believed he was not inclusive, Google’s Employee Investigations team explained that he had shown favoritism towards high performers, which it considered “non-inclusive,” and commented on employees’ walking pace and hustle, which it considered “ableist.”
Seems like no one believes him. Let's be honest: How often have you heard news about a woman molesting a man vs. a man molesting a woman?
https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/josi....
I expect I would be unemployable if I had touched a female colleague's body like that. I trust Mrs. Miller will be equally unemployable.
Why would you expect Miller to be unemployable? This is the same company that kept Vic Gundotra until Google+ itself proved unworkable.
Only those will lots of vested RSU will downvote lol. Gotta get that money at any cost