Domain Registry Takes Sci-Hub’s .SE Domain Name Offline
21–30 of 143 posts
Re: Domain Registry Takes Sci-Hub’s .SE Domain Name Offline
#22If there’s an area where a decentralized blockchain has application, it is surely DNS and the rent-seeking certificate infrastructure.
Re: Domain Registry Takes Sci-Hub’s .SE Domain Name Offline
#23Re: Domain Registry Takes Sci-Hub’s .SE Domain Name Offline
#24If there’s an area where a decentralized blockchain has application, it is surely DNS and the rent-seeking certificate infrastructure.
Certificates are free, and all certificates are surveilled with a cryptographically secure append-only log. Meanwhile, if you think the biggest problem with the DNS infrastructure we have now is rent-seeking, take a look at the blockchain alternatives that have been proposed. There might be no modern analog to "attempting to sell the Brooklyn Bridge" more fitting than blockchain DNS.
Handshake reserved the top 100,000 Alexa domains and allowed all trademark name holders to claim theirs.
Not to mention the ten million in FOSS grants for developers to build tooling
Sadly the ideologues will somehow decry their attempts for an alternative while defending the indefensible ICAAN.
Re: Domain Registry Takes Sci-Hub’s .SE Domain Name Offline
#25Re: Domain Registry Takes Sci-Hub’s .SE Domain Name Offline
#26If there’s an area where a decentralized blockchain has application, it is surely DNS and the rent-seeking certificate infrastructure.
Re: Domain Registry Takes Sci-Hub’s .SE Domain Name Offline
#27I mentioned here before, but how can we stop these domains from dying like this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34541672
Re: Domain Registry Takes Sci-Hub’s .SE Domain Name Offline
#28[dead]
Re: Domain Registry Takes Sci-Hub’s .SE Domain Name Offline
#29Re: Domain Registry Takes Sci-Hub’s .SE Domain Name Offline
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
You know what? You're right. That's literally the only proposed blockchain application I think I've ever read that I think would actually work.
I don't think it would. The moment the blockchain would start getting any traction, the big blockchain companies would use their capital to get their hands on every recognizable domain name and within days the only remaining "domains" would look like passwords. You could then probably buy readable domains for exorbitant amounts of cryptocoins. I prefer the current registrar setup over anarchist blockchain hellscapes.…