Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

ChatBCG: Generative AI For Slides

chatbcg.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

21–30 of 47 posts

Re: ChatBCG: Generative AI For Slides

#23

Post by personjerry »

version_five wrote: post #2

It asked for a signup after my first try which is not appropriate for a joke site imo. Incognito mode seems to solve it. Is it because of a fear of bots? It would be nice if there was a better way to deal with it than asking for signup

It's an upsell

Re: ChatBCG: Generative AI For Slides

#24

Post by HALtheWise »

spawarotti wrote: post #17
andirk wrote: post #16

I was surprised it used half of the slides of "obama drone strikes" about the willful neglect for the human toll of civilian deaths [0], in some cases ~90%, (find the bad guy, bomb the entire block). I was expecting more of a synopsis of what happened rather than the issues with it. The creators should take a look the only cool TechCrunch Disrupt winner, Qwiki, which turned searches in to audio and visual slides [1].…

According to [0] the toll of civilian deaths is 9% not ~90%: > The 542 drone strikes that Obama authorized killed an estimated 3,797 people, including 324 civilians.

I don't know how significant this is, but "not the intended target" and "civilian" could mean very different things. In particular, it seems likely that a strike targeted at a terrorist leader has a high chance of killing their aides or others in the car, who are probably members of the terror cell, even though they weren't the actual target of the strike.

Re: ChatBCG: Generative AI For Slides

#25

Post by phillipcarter »

pcrh wrote: post #11

Hilarious. It really goes to show how little intelligence or innovative thinking is needed for entry-level positions in McKinsey, BCG, etc.

Hiring McKinsey is a surefire way to burn a lot of money and get nothing done (see all government contracts they get).

Re: ChatBCG: Generative AI For Slides

#26

Post by [deleted] »

andirk wrote: post #16

I was surprised it used half of the slides of "obama drone strikes" about the willful neglect for the human toll of civilian deaths [0], in some cases ~90%, (find the bad guy, bomb the entire block). I was expecting more of a synopsis of what happened rather than the issues with it. The creators should take a look the only cool TechCrunch Disrupt winner, Qwiki, which turned searches in to audio and visual slides [1].…

[deleted]
Post reply on HN