Live data from Hacker News

Golink: A private shortlink service for tailnets

github.com

21–30 of 84 posts

Re: Golink: A private shortlink service for tailnets

#21
post #3

More "Go"ogle culture out in the wild. I've seen these at a few companies now. I'm a little surprised they're still called "go"-links, though I suppose the name works everywhere.

Especially because Golink seems to be (at least partially) written in Go

Pretty sure orignal google’s golinks predates Go the language by many years

Re: Golink: A private shortlink service for tailnets

#22

The name is going to be quickly problematic if the trademark holder for golinks.io decides to get litigious: https://trademarks.justia.com/owners/zamora-jorge-3828689/

I was going to say the terminology comes from inside Google, where afaik go links were invented. However, yeah, that's straight up a trademark. You'd need a lawyer to know whether the trademark would survive litigation, and whether the s on those trademarks makes a material difference. (OP isn't plural, those trademarks are)

Re: Golink: A private shortlink service for tailnets

#23

The name is going to be quickly problematic if the trademark holder for golinks.io decides to get litigious: https://trademarks.justia.com/owners/zamora-jorge-3828689/

It would also be pretty ironic if so, given that the idea was basically lifted from Google internal infra.

Re: Golink: A private shortlink service for tailnets

#24
post #11

Big fan of Tailscale, yet I wonder whether it wouldn’t be better to make internal services securely available over the internet (zero trust rather than castle-and-moat). On the other hand, the former might be just to expensive for smaller organisations.

No reason you can’t do both.

Re: Golink: A private shortlink service for tailnets

#25
Is this a general thing? I thought it was specific to my former employer (F5). We used go/(foo) extensively and there was numerous hotlinks for all sorts of internal services as well as a pretty interesting interface to design your own. I had thought it was an internal service developed internally. It looks like our internal version was a lot better than this open source version, at least by the screenshots.

Re: Golink: A private shortlink service for tailnets

#26

Is this a general thing? I thought it was specific to my former employer (F5). We used go/(foo) extensively and there was numerous hotlinks for all sorts of internal services as well as a pretty interesting interface to design your own. I had thought it was an internal service developed internally. It looks like our internal version was a lot better than this open source version, at least by the screenshots.

It originated at Google, but at this point most BigTech or places founded by former BigTech have their own version. There's even a SaaS version: https://www.golinks.io/

Re: Golink: A private shortlink service for tailnets

#28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Huh. This is a thing I've seen at a few companies now and never seen reference to them coming out of Google. It makes sense, but it's also completely standalone - "go to the page."

A couple of the startups that do go links have blog posts on the history: https://www.golinks.com/blog/go-links-history/ https://www.trot.to/blog/2020/07/09/go-links-origin-story

Those 2 stories kind of contradict each other. One says Benjamin Staffin invented golinks, then later another Googler built golinks in 2006. The other says Benjamin Staffin created golinks around 2009/2010.

Re: Golink: A private shortlink service for tailnets

#29

Is this a general thing? I thought it was specific to my former employer (F5). We used go/(foo) extensively and there was numerous hotlinks for all sorts of internal services as well as a pretty interesting interface to design your own. I had thought it was an internal service developed internally. It looks like our internal version was a lot better than this open source version, at least by the screenshots.

Yeah I had this in Square and at Twitter

Re: Golink: A private shortlink service for tailnets

#30

The name is going to be quickly problematic if the trademark holder for golinks.io decides to get litigious: https://trademarks.justia.com/owners/zamora-jorge-3828689/

It would also be pretty ironic if so, given that the idea was basically lifted from Google internal infra.

I mean, TinyURL launched in 2002.
Post reply on HN