Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t follow what you’re saying. Can you elaborate on the “shoulds” here? What principles are so important that giant corporations should leave money on the table to rightfully uphold them?
links and the nature of the internet. if i post a link to a news site on this forum, should the forum pay the news site for the traffic the news site gets? of course not.
Facebook owner Meta to remove news from platform if Congress passes media bill
21–26 of 26 posts
Re: Facebook owner Meta to remove news from platform if Congress passes media bill
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
Google displaying story snippets on the search pages obviate the need to actually visit the site itself (and load ads, content, etc) and by doing so materially harm news sites. If Google want to use the content rather than just link to it then I think compensation is fair.
The content is uncopyrightable...
Re: Facebook owner Meta to remove news from platform if Congress passes media bill
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
Google displaying story snippets on the search pages obviate the need to actually visit the site itself (and load ads, content, etc) and by doing so materially harm news sites. If Google want to use the content rather than just link to it then I think compensation is fair.
If they don’t want to be spidered maybe just use robots.txt They can’t have both: exposure AND content only available on their platform
Re: Facebook owner Meta to remove news from platform if Congress passes media bill
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Google displaying story snippets on the search pages obviate the need to actually visit the site itself (and load ads, content, etc) and by doing so materially harm news sites. If Google want to use the content rather than just link to it then I think compensation is fair.
> Google displaying story snippets on the search pages obviate the need to actually visit the site itself (and load ads, content, etc) and by doing so materially harm news sites. no, the real issue here is that news sites had their business model broken for the past 20 years. they don’t know how to fix it. they are now click baiting machines. which is deepening their broken business models as trust in them is gone. t…
Re: Facebook owner Meta to remove news from platform if Congress passes media bill
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
Google displaying story snippets on the search pages obviate the need to actually visit the site itself (and load ads, content, etc) and by doing so materially harm news sites. If Google want to use the content rather than just link to it then I think compensation is fair.
> Google displaying story snippets on the search pages obviate the need to actually visit the site itself (and load ads, content, etc) and by doing so materially harm news sites. no, the real issue here is that news sites had their business model broken for the past 20 years. they don’t know how to fix it. they are now click baiting machines. which is deepening their broken business models as trust in them is gone. t…
Then advertising on the internet took off in the 2000s, further depleting the pool of local advertising dollars available to many media organizations. Today most media organizations are a hollow shell of what they once were.
Without local news, democracy can't work, and it's sad that many places no longer have it. And quality reporting takes time and money, exactly what we don't have in today's internet. Sure, plenty of niches previously ignored are now well served, but there's a glaring gap in quality local news these days in most places.
Re: Facebook owner Meta to remove news from platform if Congress passes media bill
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
If they don’t want to be spidered maybe just use robots.txt They can’t have both: exposure AND content only available on their platform
Can you expand on that? Should Google have rights to use any of your content if you allow spidering? Including for commercial gain?