Earlier quoted context omitted.
I didn’t say they were new to the game I said they probably aren’t looking super reliable all of a sudden. Things that tend to matter a lot in that world are credibility, stability and reliability. New information has come in via a very public set of car crashes and that relationship is now looking like a liability.
Could you elaborate for those of us who don’t typically follow space news? Has Space-X had some trouble recently?
Starshield: Secured satellite network for government entities
21–30 of 162 posts
Re: Starshield: Secured satellite network for government entities
#22Sooner or later the US Government will realize the Starship will be a good launching vehicle for the ballistic missile defense. Currently a midcourse ground base interceptor booster [1] weighs more than 20 tons, costs a few tens of millions, and carries one single kill vehicle [2] that weighs about 64 kg. A single Starship would be able to carry more than 1000 such kill vehicles. If Russia launches a few hundred miss…
Re: Starshield: Secured satellite network for government entities
#23trusting a dude who is compromised by interests in China up to his eyeballs to do anything involving national security seems unwise
Re: Starshield: Secured satellite network for government entities
#24trusting a dude who is compromised by interests in China up to his eyeballs to do anything involving national security seems unwise
Re: Starshield: Secured satellite network for government entities
#25They rebranded Starlink so they can sell it to the government for 10x the price.
Re: Starshield: Secured satellite network for government entities
#26> Starlink already offers unparalleled end-to-end user data encryption. I don't understand this marketing. How would they possibly being doing E2E encryption? This is the wrong layer to be applying encryption at anyway.
Clearly they're using a different definition of end. All wireless and shared-media (DOCSIS, PON) protocols should be encrypted out of respect for customer metadata privacy.
Re: Starshield: Secured satellite network for government entities
#27Not exactly a name you want associated with anything to do with national security right now.
SpaceX has been launching Department of Defense payloads since 2006.
Re: Starshield: Secured satellite network for government entities
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
I didn’t say they were new to the game I said they probably aren’t looking super reliable all of a sudden. Things that tend to matter a lot in that world are credibility, stability and reliability. New information has come in via a very public set of car crashes and that relationship is now looking like a liability.
Could you elaborate for those of us who don’t typically follow space news? Has Space-X had some trouble recently?
The owner with an 80% voting control of the company has had some very serious issues in judgement lately not limited to the Twitter fiasco but has also made a number of public moves that were very friendly towards what the US has called their biggest national security threat repeatedly for the past half decade or longer.
In a national security context that would be generally thought of as a completely unacceptable amount of leverage for your main enemy to have over your national security infrastructure.
This isn’t some mindless Elon bashing post, I’m presenting this as an actual honest to god problem for natsec.
Re: Starshield: Secured satellite network for government entities
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
I didn’t say they were new to the game I said they probably aren’t looking super reliable all of a sudden. Things that tend to matter a lot in that world are credibility, stability and reliability. New information has come in via a very public set of car crashes and that relationship is now looking like a liability.
Could you elaborate for those of us who don’t typically follow space news? Has Space-X had some trouble recently?
But I think if Musk were to die in a mysterious Tesla fire tomorrow, not much would change for the worse at the company for quite some time.
Re: Starshield: Secured satellite network for government entities
#30Sooner or later the US Government will realize the Starship will be a good launching vehicle for the ballistic missile defense. Currently a midcourse ground base interceptor booster [1] weighs more than 20 tons, costs a few tens of millions, and carries one single kill vehicle [2] that weighs about 64 kg. A single Starship would be able to carry more than 1000 such kill vehicles. If Russia launches a few hundred miss…
SpaceX already has contracts for a Missile Defense Shield (w/ SDA, now part of Space Force). Govt program was started by Mike Griffin-- one of the early founders of Strategic Defense Initiative, space kill vehicles, and SpaceX itself. His history with Elon is fascinating. https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_D._Griffin#Career
Yes that's the plan. Sounds like Biden Admin wasn't a fan of Star Wars and has been slowing Elon down.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink#Military_capabilities