Conversely Perl and C++ made me miserable, as I tried and tried and gave up learning them. I prefer Excel formulae to working with them.
Crystal for Rubyists
21–30 of 94 posts
I fucking love Crystal and Ruby. Never has a language literally made me happy like those two. "Amazement wow is this how easy I can achieve this. This is incredible!!!".
Re: Crystal for Rubyists
#22Re: Crystal for Rubyists
#23Re: Crystal for Rubyists
#24How is wasm support going? I know they have to "throw away" many of their inventions in lieu of single threads and untouchable stacks, but the core of type inference still maps well to wasm (?)
Re: Crystal for Rubyists
#25> Crystalian [being the name for Crystal users/evangelists] Man, there have to be better alternatives than this. Did you try “crystacean?” Chuckles in .rs.
Crynge.
Re: Crystal for Rubyists
#26Re: Crystal for Rubyists
#27Re: Crystal for Rubyists
#28With advent of code coming up I'm torn between Kotlin and maybe Crystal.
Re: Crystal for Rubyists
#29Crystal is a lovely language. The language community is small though, and learning resources are also small. The story for Crystal is the same story for many programming languages: grow the interest of users, and find generous funding.
My impression is that not many Ruby programmers have switched to Crystal. The slow(ish) Crystal compilation will not please Ruby users. And Crystal for Windows is still in beta.
Despite these factors, Crystal is a pleasure to use - fast, readable, and a well-featured standard libary.
Re: Crystal for Rubyists
#30> What’s awesome about Ruby?
> Dynamically typed
As someone who has experienced the joy and at least some feeling of safety from moving to typescript from javascript, I would seriously question that dynamic typing is awesome.