Live data from Hacker News

Over 16k people still use a Pebble smartwatch

rebble.io

21–30 of 398 posts

Re: Over 16k people still use a Pebble smartwatch

#21

If it works for you, why would you migrate to a different product with features or performance outside of your needs? We are so deep into a disposable society that we eagerly await the NEXT BIG THING (TM) without ever evaluating what our need consists of or whether we have any need for an upgrade to begin with.

Well, the threat of the service going away is a pretty big one. Until we have devices that can work from our own hosted systems, this will always be a concern.

Re: Over 16k people still use a Pebble smartwatch

#22
post #5

Pebble was a game changer. Mine's in a drawer somewhere..

Same, I just got solar + radio sync watch as replacement, not having to do anything ever with it beats having to charge for some extra features, even if it is just once a week, "modern" one that I'd need to charge every day or two just sounds annoying...

Re: Over 16k people still use a Pebble smartwatch

#23
post #11
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s interesting to me that when the Apple Watch was coming out (and maybe more broadly when fitness bands etc. were becoming available) there was a pretty widespread sentiment that younger people didn’t want watches because why would they? They always had their phones.

Honestly, I still don't see the value in a smartwatch. Paying with nfc with your wrist? That's probably the only use case I can see. But then it's not worth it having to charge yet another device daily

I have a use case for a watch. I like being able to just look at my wrist.

Especially when traveling and doing activities like hiking, I do find watch modestly useful. Hiking distance etc. Apple Pay as you say. Calendar events and other notifications.

It is for me modest benefit and I often wear a cheap Timex at home. And yes the charging is the big downside although there are quite a few things I do daily that are a routine.

Re: Over 16k people still use a Pebble smartwatch

#24

If it works for you, why would you migrate to a different product with features or performance outside of your needs? We are so deep into a disposable society that we eagerly await the NEXT BIG THING (TM) without ever evaluating what our need consists of or whether we have any need for an upgrade to begin with.

The pebble was a bit of a gimmick. It was the start of the future but on its own it was kind of worse than a regular watch. It looked ugly, had a terrible screen, didn’t have any of the stuff you mostly do with a smartwatch now. And half the features no longer work.

Re: Over 16k people still use a Pebble smartwatch

#26
As a big Pebble fan, I was really sad to see the company go without any similar alternatives in the market (at the time). My watches ended up having various hardware issues over the years, so I switched to something else. The efforts Rebble has put in to keep these devices alive is amazing. If they grow bigger, I'd love to see them do hardware.

In the meantime, I'm wearing a Withings ScanWatch [0]. Not as extendable as a Pebble, but it has some features I care about and doesn't distract me.

[0] https://www.withings.com/ch/en/scanwatch

Re: Over 16k people still use a Pebble smartwatch

#27
That few?

I wasn't a huge fan of Pebble, the company - they didn't sell replacement parts, for instance (the watch for geeks? yeah, sure).

For some crazy reason, though, to this day, this watch is still almost the only one that gets such a basic thing right: Telling the damn time.

The formula is as simple as it is unreplicated:

- Always telling the time

- Good battery life

- Buttons

Why nobody else makes such a watch is a mystery to me. The Amazfit Bip comes close, but it requires touch interaction and doesn't look as nice as the Pebble Time Steel. It's also supported by GadgetBridge though and also does heart rate tracking while having much better battery life (while being smaller!). When my Bip broke after a few months I bought another (5 years old at this point!) Pebble and am pretty happy with it. I could use some heart rate tracking, though.

Re: Over 16k people still use a Pebble smartwatch

#28

If it works for you, why would you migrate to a different product with features or performance outside of your needs? We are so deep into a disposable society that we eagerly await the NEXT BIG THING (TM) without ever evaluating what our need consists of or whether we have any need for an upgrade to begin with.

True. But perhaps 16k people sold their Pebble because they wanted a shiny new watch, and they were bought by 16k other people who can't afford that new watch.

Re: Over 16k people still use a Pebble smartwatch

#29
post #11
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s interesting to me that when the Apple Watch was coming out (and maybe more broadly when fitness bands etc. were becoming available) there was a pretty widespread sentiment that younger people didn’t want watches because why would they? They always had their phones.

Honestly, I still don't see the value in a smartwatch. Paying with nfc with your wrist? That's probably the only use case I can see. But then it's not worth it having to charge yet another device daily

Charging it isn’t really a difficultly. I don’t like to sleep with a watch on so I take it off and put it on my side table. Where the magnetic charger snaps on. Basically no more effort than not charging it.

Re: Over 16k people still use a Pebble smartwatch

#30
post #5

Pebble was a game changer. Mine's in a drawer somewhere..

Mine too. Would one or two of the 16k please make the pitch. What are the features that keep you using it? How much work to get it going again?

This is timely for me as I’m now in the doghouse for missing a reminder to take my kid to the dentist yesterday :(

Post reply on HN