This looks... pretty terrible. The images being generated are fine, but the conversion from 2D to 3D is awful. It looks like something poorly lasso-tool'd around the subject, put it on another layer closer to the viewer, and then very poorly interpolated the space that's visible between the two layers when you look at it from an angle. Am I missing something? I feel like I've seen much better automatic 2D->3D convers…
Re: Stable Diffusion to 3D/WebVR, in the cloud, available now
#21What I find strange is that it fills the missing details with completely unrelated images. As an example, this "An astronaut meeting the president" uses a layer of grass and trees to fill the missing scenery on Mars.