Ah yes, security concerns that pose O(N!) complexity monetary considerations, this is what I need to think about right now.
Guthib
21–30 of 137 posts
Re: Guthib
#22The actual reason these common misspelling domains are acquired is to make it harder to perform scams.
Re: Guthib
#23It used to be more verbose:
> This is not the [distributed version control system hub](https://github.com/) that you're looking for.
https://web.archive.org/web/20110107153429/http://guthib.com...
Re: Guthib
#24Doesn't have quite the style of http://pythong.org [NSFW]
(Didn't think to mark it until people commented, and technically there's no nudity, but if you are looking at it and someone passes your desk they'll THINK there is nudity, and if you are actually at work I think that passes the bar.)
Re: Guthib
#25Re: Guthib
#26Doesn't have quite the style of http://pythong.org [NSFW] (Didn't think to mark it until people commented, and technically there's no nudity, but if you are looking at it and someone passes your desk they'll THINK there is nudity, and if you are actually at work I think that passes the bar.)
lol
Re: Guthib
#27I don't understand why people upvote this garbage. Do they find it funny? Or interesting?
Re: Guthib
#28I always thought someone should make a github for cooking recipes and call it guthub
Or a gun site called Gathub.com.
Re: Guthib
#29I don't understand why people upvote this garbage. Do they find it funny? Or interesting?
Yes
Re: Guthib
#30I don't understand why people upvote this garbage. Do they find it funny? Or interesting?
> The most dangerous thing for the frontpage is stuff that's too easy to upvote. If someone proves a new theorem, it takes some work by the reader to decide whether or not to upvote it. An amusing cartoon takes less. A rant with a rallying cry as the title takes zero, because people vote it up without even reading it.
Paul Graham, What I've Learned from Hacker News[1]