Earlier quoted context omitted.
Even as a Rust user, I'd prefer to reduce the attack surface by having a userspace network stack. Tanenbaum gets the last laugh. Of course, once it's in userspace you can write it in whatever language you want. But as a network-facing component, yes, it should preferably be written in a memory-safe language as much as possible, since it's extremely high-risk and the first target for remote adversaries.
Promoting Rust might feel good, but it does not have the desired effect. Promoting action that would have the desired effect would tend more to have the desired effect, even though less personally gratifying. Your choice, but being seen to choose reveals.
Why not? I don't have a bone in the fight (never written any Rust), but memory safe languages seem like such a no-brainer to me.