Live data from Hacker News

Never pay for online dating (2010)

web.archive.org

21–30 of 495 posts

Re: Never pay for online dating (2010)

#21
post #9

You, as a user of a dating app, are forever in a Nash Equilibrium with the dating app. When you find the love of your life, you delete the app forever. Therefore, everything the app does to help you find that person works directly against their own goals (user growth, “engagement”. subscriptions).

Isn’t hinge addressing this

[deleted]

Re: Never pay for online dating (2010)

#23
post #9

You, as a user of a dating app, are forever in a Nash Equilibrium with the dating app. When you find the love of your life, you delete the app forever. Therefore, everything the app does to help you find that person works directly against their own goals (user growth, “engagement”. subscriptions).

Isn’t hinge addressing this

How are they doing it? Is it a poly app?

Re: Never pay for online dating (2010)

#25
post #9

You, as a user of a dating app, are forever in a Nash Equilibrium with the dating app. When you find the love of your life, you delete the app forever. Therefore, everything the app does to help you find that person works directly against their own goals (user growth, “engagement”. subscriptions).

Isn’t hinge addressing this

can you explain more?

Re: Never pay for online dating (2010)

#26
post #8

OkCupid used to have great engineering blogs often with an embedded and nuanced social commentary regarding the haves vs have-nots when it comes to the dating world. I believe at one point they divided users, or rather let them self-classify as A-team and B-team. Some would never even pass each other in the hallway based on this score and designation.

I'm not sure I understand what you are saying about A/B or how hallways fit into online dating.

Re: Never pay for online dating (2010)

#27
post #8

OkCupid used to have great engineering blogs often with an embedded and nuanced social commentary regarding the haves vs have-nots when it comes to the dating world. I believe at one point they divided users, or rather let them self-classify as A-team and B-team. Some would never even pass each other in the hallway based on this score and designation.

Their articles were really interesting too; its sad Match took all of them down. One of the ones I distinctly remember was about the right profile pictures. Its been years, but I clearly remember for men it was something along the lines of "full body, outdoor picture, while shirtless looking away from the camera"

Re: Never pay for online dating (2010)

#28
post #12

OkCupid was bought by Match Group (who run almost all online dating sites, including Match, eHarmony, and Tinder) in 2011 and took down this post not long after. EDIT: the purchase was Feb 2011 [1] and the post was removed sometime between Jan 2011 [2] and Mar 2011 [3]. The rest of the blog was still up at the time [4]. [1] https://www.npr.org/2011/02/03/133456140/The-Last-Word-In-Bu... [2] https://web.archive.org/we…

More Orwellian still, they edited articles that contained data inconvenient to the politically correct narrative and elite ideology.

Edit: Here's an example.

“I’m bisexual.” REALITY: 80% of self-identified bisexuals are only interested in one gender.

People who describe themselves as bisexual overwhelmingly message either one sex or the other, not both as you might expect.

https://web.archive.org/web/20170307114207/https://theblog.o...

They presented the reality based on data, it's not subjective, it's revealed preferences. Match.com removed that section and updated the article with "This post has was originally published in 2010 and has since been updated to reflect OkCupid’s current values."

Re: Never pay for online dating (2010)

#29
post #9

You, as a user of a dating app, are forever in a Nash Equilibrium with the dating app. When you find the love of your life, you delete the app forever. Therefore, everything the app does to help you find that person works directly against their own goals (user growth, “engagement”. subscriptions).

Isn’t hinge addressing this

Seeing as how Hinge is also owned by the Match Group... probably not.
Post reply on HN