Live data from Hacker News

Everything I wish I had known about raising a seed round

mdwdotla.medium.com

21–30 of 95 posts

Re: Everything I wish I had known about raising a seed round

#21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>>with even VCs straight-up telling us that if we were raising in US we'd be offered 5-10x more than here Serious question: Then why even remotely bother raising from European VCs? Doing so is clearly not in your best interest. Is it a matter of pride?

Not many of them are willing to invest in EU startups at early stage - a lot explicitly say they invest in NA only, and I assume a lot of them just don't want the legal difficulties - also it's much harder to get warm intros to US investors if most of your network is based in Europe, and logistics to do a in-person meeting are way harder if somebody is on the other side of the world.

Even if the company is incorporated in Delaware ?

Re: Everything I wish I had known about raising a seed round

#22

For anyone reading this advice. The number 1 reason why Matt’s fundraising process went as well as it did is because he has a world-class personal track record. This dwarfs all other reasons by a long way. Quite frankly Matt would have been able to raise with complete air (assuming that his cofounders have similar personal track records). That’s not to take anything away from Matt. He’s clearly an accomplished indivi…

Yes and he was also part of the boys club by knowing a bunch of VCs. Who you know is more important than what you are building in the modern game of venture capital.

Re: Everything I wish I had known about raising a seed round

#23

For anyone reading this advice. The number 1 reason why Matt’s fundraising process went as well as it did is because he has a world-class personal track record. This dwarfs all other reasons by a long way. Quite frankly Matt would have been able to raise with complete air (assuming that his cofounders have similar personal track records). That’s not to take anything away from Matt. He’s clearly an accomplished indivi…

Absolutely true. I'll add that THREE paragraphs start with "calling my VC friends", which factors in heavily on how "easy" it was to raise.

Re: Everything I wish I had known about raising a seed round

#24
post #6
post #3

This post is all true. One caveat (which is mentioned in the post): this person has multiple VC’s in his network and knows multiple founders who have raised on nothing but a deck. Many, many, many future founders are not as lucky. So, I guess rule -1 is: get to know VC’s, Angels and other previously funded founders.

Yeah, reading the sentence "Before starting the fundraising process, my first stop was to call up some VC friends of mine and ask them how to get things going" made me roll my eyes. Rest of the article is interesting, though.

Why?

Making friends with VCs before soliciting them for money is a smart move.

Re: Everything I wish I had known about raising a seed round

#25
I raised a few $M with just 10 slides during the VC frenzy last year. I agree with the post but I view this from a social angle. The entire VC industry is driven by BullShit. VCs raise money from LPs (pensions, rich people) by claiming they have deal flow (they can get into the next big thing) and an “investing thesis” (some BS about the future, usually a bombastic spin on a current fad). VCs are finance bros that believe their own BS.

Your pitch should fit the current investing zeitgeist. If you pitch some oddball idea then you need to move your audience from 0 to 100% in 1 hr. If you pitch “AI generated metaverse for basketweaving” then the background hype has sold half your story. But also, VCs need other VCs to co-invest. They need to explain this investment to their LPs. It’s easier to pitch AI nonsense than something truly novel.

Every VC wants to see Matt’s pitch because he’s got a great resume. VCs don’t invest alone, so they will pass the deck around to their VC network. But it’s also sharing deal flow: I send you this, please send me the decks you’ve got.

VCs like to keep their options open. Even if they hate your idea, if A16Z invests then they’ll want to get back in. Or if you succeed then they’ll want to get into the next round. I had a VC offer a very low valuation. When I got 10X more elsewhere, they called back that they wanted in. The numbers are all BS: valuations, seed size, etc. Remember, their goal is to invest as cheaply as possible. Your goal is to sell as little of your company as possible.

Strangely, BS artists love other BS artists. Adam Neumann is a God-tier bullshit messiah with sociopathic self-confidence. It’s no wonder that he raised billions after the self-dealing disaster at WeWork. Matt is right: confidence is insanely important. Your company is a $1T opportunity that will change the course of humanity. (In fact, outrageous confidence is important everywhere. Humans are just really gullible fools.)

Re: Everything I wish I had known about raising a seed round

#26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>>with even VCs straight-up telling us that if we were raising in US we'd be offered 5-10x more than here Serious question: Then why even remotely bother raising from European VCs? Doing so is clearly not in your best interest. Is it a matter of pride?

Very few US VCs will/can invest in non-US companies at the seed stage.

What does non-US mean? European Founders could register a Delaware company. Is that good enough?

Re: Everything I wish I had known about raising a seed round

#28

Looking at this as a founder thats currently raising a seed round (or pre-seed, tho as I understand, same position as OP) in Europe with an MVP. Some parts ring true, as in VC's you never heard of contacting you on LinkedIn, sharing decks between their contacts and keeping in touch to build a relationship. The part about common pitch deck advice being geared towards live pitches especially - we haven't done a single…

I'll ask - what's your startup? As an American living in Europe who really doesn't want to move back this is disheartening to say the least. Moving here did basically mean taking a sledgehammer to my career, admittedly.

Re: Everything I wish I had known about raising a seed round

#30
post #23

For anyone reading this advice. The number 1 reason why Matt’s fundraising process went as well as it did is because he has a world-class personal track record. This dwarfs all other reasons by a long way. Quite frankly Matt would have been able to raise with complete air (assuming that his cofounders have similar personal track records). That’s not to take anything away from Matt. He’s clearly an accomplished indivi…

Absolutely true. I'll add that THREE paragraphs start with "calling my VC friends", which factors in heavily on how "easy" it was to raise.

This is some "the rest of the owl" material for sure.
Post reply on HN