Detection of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk • Hacker News Board

Re: Detection of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk

#21

Post by suprjami » Wed, Sep 28, 2022, 1:50 AM UTC

CentralHarvest wrote: post #15

suprjami wrote: post #11

The comment on that page: > The method (eSupplement) states the study was conduce between February and October 2020. That surprises me because the vaccinations being studied were not available to the public for that entire period. The first dose outside a clinical trial was given in Queens, New York on December 14 that year. Before this, they were only available as part of trials which excluded lactating individuals.

Seems likely that this is a typo which should have said 2021.

No post body was provided.

Re: Detection of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk

#22

Post by CentralHarvest » Wed, Sep 28, 2022, 3:21 AM UTC

suprjami wrote: post #21

CentralHarvest wrote: post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Seems likely that this is a typo which should have said 2021.

Quoted post unavailable.

No post body was provided.

Re: Detection of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk

#23

Post by dang » Wed, Sep 28, 2022, 9:03 AM UTC

CentralHarvest wrote: post #22

suprjami wrote: post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

Quoted post unavailable.

You've clearly been using HN primarily for ideological battle. That's not allowed, regardless of what you're battling for or against. It's not what this site is for, and it destroys what it is for, so we have no choice but to ban such accounts and I've banned this one.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re: Detection of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk

#24

Post by peteradio » Wed, Sep 28, 2022, 1:51 PM UTC

"there is no evidence of such and such" should be followed by "are we actually looking for it?" I am sick of the dishonest rhetoric in the last several years, what a waste of confidence.

Re: Detection of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk

#25

Post by craydandy » Wed, Sep 28, 2022, 2:11 PM UTC

suprjami wrote: post #11

The comment on that page: > The method (eSupplement) states the study was conduce between February and October 2020. That surprises me because the vaccinations being studied were not available to the public for that entire period. The first dose outside a clinical trial was given in Queens, New York on December 14 that year. Before this, they were only available as part of trials which excluded lactating individuals.

One of the authors has responded to the comment:

> The Supplement section of the letter states that the study was conducted from February to October 2020. The year reported was an error; the study was conducted in 2021. The Journal is in the process of correcting this error.