Live data from Hacker News

DataBorg – Knowledge Management Simplified

databorg.ai

21–30 of 47 posts

Re: DataBorg – Knowledge Management Simplified

#21

Oh boy. The ol "wasn't ready for HN" problemo. Good luck with that one! Cool product of course. ;)

I got following error after trying the demos on the homepage

“You have made too many requests. Please login or try again in a few seconds.”

You might think about adding exception for your domain or the sample text you provide.

Re: DataBorg – Knowledge Management Simplified

#22

Oh boy. The ol "wasn't ready for HN" problemo. Good luck with that one! Cool product of course. ;)

I got following error after trying the demos on the homepage “You have made too many requests. Please login or try again in a few seconds.” You might think about adding exception for your domain or the sample text you provide.

I've lowered the rate-limiting to 1s, so it should be less of an issue now. But I like the idea of adding examples to exceptions, thanks!

Re: DataBorg – Knowledge Management Simplified

#23
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

Not cool

I know right? These ̶l̶e̶e̶c̶h̶e̶s̶ unethical people using other peoples donated work to enrich themselves probably built their product and host their infrastructure with open source software.

edit: yep looks like they did - https://huggingface.co/Babelscape/rebel-large cc-by-nc-sa-4.0

I would appreciate being unflagged since I was right on the money.

Re: DataBorg – Knowledge Management Simplified

#24
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hi, CTO of DataBorg here. Thanks for trying it out! We weren't quite ready to announce it to public just yet :) But hey, can't do much about it now. Pricing is still a bit of placeholder - there'll be 10x more credits on free tier soon-ish. There is quite a number of ways you could utilize named entity recognition (NER) and/or knowledge graphs (KGs). Ranging from extracting mentioned entities (to e.g. provide a quick…

Got it, so the pitch is to provide a building block to help others build knowledge graphs. Do you see substantial uptake of knowledge graphs in industry? many of the examples I've seen historically either propose building a knowledge graph for the sake of a knowledge graph. Or work on a particular product which lends itself to knowledge graphs such as Question and Answering. Coming from someone who's worked in NLP fo…

Yep, that'd be the pitch! In the beginning we'll just provide API for people who know what they need / want. Later on the plan is to have "all-in-one" products for end users directly (but that'll take time).

On KGs and industry - as far as we are aware, they are quite widespread. Most of fortune 500 companies use KGs in some form. QA is definitely one of the applications. There's also been quite a bit of work done on e.g. explainable AI using KGs lately (one of the areas we're working on as well).

Re: DataBorg – Knowledge Management Simplified

#25
Is this built off of https://huggingface.co/Babelscape/rebel-large ? It's shared under cc-by-nc-sa-4.0 Doesn't nc stand for non-commercial? "Non commercial share alike - Redistribute, revise, remix using the same license as the original for non commercial use only". Looks like you're in violation of this license.

Re: DataBorg – Knowledge Management Simplified

#26
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not cool

I know right? These ̶l̶e̶e̶c̶h̶e̶s̶ unethical people using other peoples donated work to enrich themselves probably built their product and host their infrastructure with open source software. edit: yep looks like they did - https://huggingface.co/Babelscape/rebel-large cc-by-nc-sa-4.0 I would appreciate being unflagged since I was right on the money.

Dehumanizing terminology…

This is not the kind of discussion that I like to see here. Again, not cool.

People build proprietary closed source software using open source software. That’s not a new concept and completely ethical if one abides by the license and terms.

If you don’t like their product, don’t use it, or go make your own.

Re: DataBorg – Knowledge Management Simplified

#27
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I know right? These ̶l̶e̶e̶c̶h̶e̶s̶ unethical people using other peoples donated work to enrich themselves probably built their product and host their infrastructure with open source software. edit: yep looks like they did - https://huggingface.co/Babelscape/rebel-large cc-by-nc-sa-4.0 I would appreciate being unflagged since I was right on the money.

Dehumanizing terminology… This is not the kind of discussion that I like to see here. Again, not cool. People build proprietary closed source software using open source software. That’s not a new concept and completely ethical if one abides by the license and terms. If you don’t like their product, don’t use it, or go make your own.

"completely ethical if one abides by the license and terms." They aren't.

Re: DataBorg – Knowledge Management Simplified

#28

Is this built off of https://huggingface.co/Babelscape/rebel-large ? It's shared under cc-by-nc-sa-4.0 Doesn't nc stand for non-commercial? "Non commercial share alike - Redistribute, revise, remix using the same license as the original for non commercial use only". Looks like you're in violation of this license.

how do you identify that it might be built off that?

Re: DataBorg – Knowledge Management Simplified

#30
post #28

Is this built off of https://huggingface.co/Babelscape/rebel-large ? It's shared under cc-by-nc-sa-4.0 Doesn't nc stand for non-commercial? "Non commercial share alike - Redistribute, revise, remix using the same license as the original for non commercial use only". Looks like you're in violation of this license.

how do you identify that it might be built off that?

They forked it on their github which is linked from their landing page: https://github.com/orgs/DataBorg/repositories

edit: also https://github.com/DataBorg/wikineural which has a non-commercial license as well. Does HN like to see this kind of discussion here?

Post reply on HN