Great chart and SF downtown has a denser deep blue color; always suspected that is a more risky place for pedestrian.
Without some way to control for density of cars/pedestrians, this chart is quite useless.
21–30 of 104 posts
Great chart and SF downtown has a denser deep blue color; always suspected that is a more risky place for pedestrian.
Without some way to control for density of cars/pedestrians, this chart is quite useless.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, it was mostly in jest, yes, but I think it's more than just that, I think it's also that here on the west coast we tend to drive a lot better than people in New York ;)
Unless there's a drop of rain on the road, then all bets are off and everyone drives 80 miles an hour less than the speed limit.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you think SF is bad, look at Manhattan. What's with all the 99 year old deaths in NYC? Bad data?
I dunno, Manhattan is sloooooooow-moving, I'm not sure how you can fatally injure somebody at 5MPH gridlock!
I think a per-person version of this chart would be interesting as well, dividing the map into regions, counting the number of accidents, and dividing it by the number of people in the region. Placement of accidents is less interesting than chance you will have an accident if you live there IMO. Still cool though :)
East coast: death, west coast: not so death
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you think SF is bad, look at Manhattan. What's with all the 99 year old deaths in NYC? Bad data?
I dunno, Manhattan is sloooooooow-moving, I'm not sure how you can fatally injure somebody at 5MPH gridlock!
I saw a billboard last time I drove through NYC, explaining why the speed limit is 35 rather than 45. It basically said that if a car hits a pedestrian going 35, the pedestrian will probably live, but if a car hits a pedestrian going 45, the pedestrian will probably die.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You probably said this in jest, but if you look at a map of US population density, it is nearly identical.
Well, it was mostly in jest, yes, but I think it's more than just that, I think it's also that here on the west coast we tend to drive a lot better than people in New York ;)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You probably said this in jest, but if you look at a map of US population density, it is nearly identical.
Well, it was mostly in jest, yes, but I think it's more than just that, I think it's also that here on the west coast we tend to drive a lot better than people in New York ;)
There seems to be a (near) 1:2 ratio between motorcycle and vehicle fatalities. I already knew motorcycle riders were 5 times more likely to get in accidents, and those accidents were 35 times more likely to result in very serious injury. In my life so far I've been in one small fender bender.
This does confirm some of the self-imposed safety rules I'm planning. No car commercial road joyriding. Lots of yellow in the hills. Highway driving seems to be relatively safe, which is comforting. Extreme caution at intersections (look at the bay bridge on-ramp). No riding at night.