21–30 of 1001 posts
> We have never been their hosting provider That is simply not how it works. The bits came from Cloudflare.
That is not how it works both technically and legally. Providing a reverse proxy is not the same as hosting the content.
Quoted post unavailable.
Why?
It is a hotbed for stochastic terrorism. It should be welcome to exist online, but Cloudflare providing it protection undermines Cloudflare's own reputation.
Quoted post unavailable.
It's not an easy line to take, and other companies like Google and Facebook have not made that same choice to stay neutral.
> Some argue that we should terminate these services to content we find reprehensible so that others can launch attacks to knock it offline. That is the equivalent argument in the physical world that the fire department shouldn't respond to fires in the homes of people who do not possess sufficient moral character
1. https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflares-abuse-policies-and-a...
> We have never been their hosting provider That is simply not how it works. The bits came from Cloudflare.
That is not how it works both technically and legally. Providing a reverse proxy is not the same as hosting the content.
Quoted post unavailable.
Quoted post unavailable.
Why?
KF is still on the internet, they’re free to handle their own traffic and find a cdn willing to take their (apparently blatantly neonazi named) operating company’s money
> We have never been their hosting provider That is simply not how it works. The bits came from Cloudflare.
That is not how it works both technically and legally. Providing a reverse proxy is not the same as hosting the content.