http://(Type any keyword here).jpg.to

Post by folkster » Sat, Nov 19, 2011, 11:26 PM UTC

TeMPOraL wrote: post #19

folkster wrote: post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good observation. But if you embed it on webpage (in which refer header is sent) it would turn into real image file, which means it WORKS when you include it in forum, blogs, etc. :)

Refer header is not a good way to distinguish between embedded images and images accessed directly by user. AFAIK that header will have the same value both when you load an embedded image and when you click on a direct link to the image. I did a little bit of research about it few years ago; the summary can be seen here: http://temporal.pr0.pl/devblog/2009/09/14/eksperyment-podsum... (pl_PL) http://translate.google.c…

Post by TeMPOraL » Sat, Nov 19, 2011, 11:31 PM UTC

folkster wrote: post #21

TeMPOraL wrote: post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Refer header is not a good way to distinguish between embedded images and images accessed directly by user. AFAIK that header will have the same value both when you load an embedded image and when you click on a direct link to the image. I did a little bit of research about it few years ago; the summary can be seen here: http://temporal.pr0.pl/devblog/2009/09/14/eksperyment-podsum... (pl_PL) http://translate.google.c…

Thanks so much for the info. I have been looking for a way to distinguish them long time ago.

Post by folkster » Sat, Nov 19, 2011, 11:32 PM UTC

garethsprice wrote: post #20

Cute. Needs a method to return the URL as a 301 redirect so it could be used as a placeholder image. This could be in the image filename. For example: http://kittens.jpg.to/301.jpg Another feature could be to return a random result for that image search. For example: http://ass.jpg.to/random.jpg

Post by grobo » Sat, Nov 19, 2011, 11:38 PM UTC

Post by Neodudeman » Sat, Nov 19, 2011, 11:45 PM UTC