Live data from Hacker News

Rejected.us

rejected.us

21–25 of 25 posts

Re: Rejected.us

#21

If being ghosted is being rejected, then I have been rejected hundreds of times.

Isn't it? They didn't offer you the job.

I cant be the only one that has had the radio silence for >6months then gotten a call offering the role - and no I passed thanks.

Re: Rejected.us

#22

Cool foe these folks who turned their luck around, but it's mentally exhausting having hope at this point - I'm at peace with my mediocrity.

Mediocrity is the best! You live a good life and don't suffer from all the expectation of being amazing or even above-average.

Re: Rejected.us

#24
Abit disappointed to only seeing large tech companies making adtech or similar things.

Not saying these around good places to be well paid but I believe that are more important problems to solve than creating thumbsups and likes. It is also not a shame to own a large farm or serve in an orphanage in a third world country.

Re: Rejected.us

#25
The one that was rejected because he did not use semicolons in his JavaScript is interesting. So are a few others that were rejected for not knowing specific things about whatever language the company used.

These rejections at first seem idiotic, especially the semicolon one. Surely the company could have simply told the developer "our style standard requires semicolons" and the developer would have been able to quickly and easily adapt. And surely any decent developer could learn in a reasonable amount of time those parts of the language that the company uses that the develop has not previously used enough to memorize.

30-40 years ago that is what would have happened. It was not at all uncommon to get hired for a new job that used a language you didn't know or had not used much, on an operating system you hadn't used, and involving hardware that was new to you.

But 30-40 years ago, we stayed at our jobs a lot longer. I wonder if that is why it was different? If it took a couple months or so to start getting productive and a year to become expert at the stuff that was new to you it was no big deal. You were likely going to be there for the better part of a decade.

So maybe now, if you can only expect employees to stay on average 2-3 years at the big SV tech companies employers want people who start out as experts in as much as possible of the tools they use, so the only training to get up to speed needed learning that company's particular systems?

Post reply on HN