Live data from Hacker News

A prominent composer lost his Wikipedia page

tedgioia.substack.com

21–30 of 185 posts

Re: A prominent composer lost his Wikipedia page

#21
post #10
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sorry, but I think that composer is relevant. So this is not about knowing policy, it is about disagreement.

One of the reasons for the policies is so questions such as "should this person have an article" don't devolve into popularity polls.

I'm sorry, but "is this musician notable" literally is a popularity contest.

Re: A prominent composer lost his Wikipedia page

#23
post #21
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One of the reasons for the policies is so questions such as "should this person have an article" don't devolve into popularity polls.

I'm sorry, but "is this musician notable" literally is a popularity contest.

I was about to post this.

Re: A prominent composer lost his Wikipedia page

#24
> A few days ago, composer Bruce Faulconer found that his Wikipedia entry had suddenly disappeared. This was surprising because his music is known and beloved all over the world—in fact, it has been heard in more than 80 countries.

Hmmm how do I already know from the first paragraph this article is bogus? Let me search this person I've never heard of. Oh, there's nothing. He's literally not noteable. "Heard in more than 80 countries" is something small independent internet artists did 20 years ago, and they didn't get wikipedia pages either.

Re: A prominent composer lost his Wikipedia page

#25

Please read the discussion that deleted this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletio... It's a hard problem. Volunteer editors are spread thinly over millions of articles, some of which (like "Bruce Faulconer") are about living people that are really important to get right.[1] The project has settled on the guideline of _notability_, meaning that articles are kept only if they have signi…

It seems to me that erroring on the side of not deleting is probably a better policy.

Re: A prominent composer lost his Wikipedia page

#26

> A few days ago, composer Bruce Faulconer found that his Wikipedia entry had suddenly disappeared. This was surprising because his music is known and beloved all over the world—in fact, it has been heard in more than 80 countries. Hmmm how do I already know from the first paragraph this article is bogus? Let me search this person I've never heard of. Oh, there's nothing. He's literally not noteable. "Heard in more t…

Dude he's the guy that did the music for Dragonball, a thirty billion dollar franchise. I'm shocked he was removed from Wikipedia.

Re: A prominent composer lost his Wikipedia page

#27

> A few days ago, composer Bruce Faulconer found that his Wikipedia entry had suddenly disappeared. This was surprising because his music is known and beloved all over the world—in fact, it has been heard in more than 80 countries. Hmmm how do I already know from the first paragraph this article is bogus? Let me search this person I've never heard of. Oh, there's nothing. He's literally not noteable. "Heard in more t…

Is this a different Bruce Faulconer? [0]. Google has 176,000 results.

[0] https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0269023/

Re: A prominent composer lost his Wikipedia page

#28

Wikipedia includes entries based on notability, but they have their own idea on notability. A friend of mine is a famous voice actor who has won not one but two CLIO awards. Wikipedia deleted the page I created for him on the basis that he was not notable. Another page I created was for the person who introduced deaf sign language to New Zealand. Deleted as she was not notable. There are more than 19,000 entries for…

Sounds like The Clio Awards need to get the word out

Re: A prominent composer lost his Wikipedia page

#29

Please read the discussion that deleted this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletio... It's a hard problem. Volunteer editors are spread thinly over millions of articles, some of which (like "Bruce Faulconer") are about living people that are really important to get right.[1] The project has settled on the guideline of _notability_, meaning that articles are kept only if they have signi…

It seems to me that erroring on the side of not deleting is probably a better policy.

Normally I'd agree, but I think the opposite for living people in particular
Post reply on HN