Live data from Hacker News

Wikenigma is an encyclopedia for topics with unknown answers

wikenigma.org.uk

21–30 of 77 posts

Re: Wikenigma is an encyclopedia for topics with unknown answers

#21
post #16
post #11

While I found the concept interesting, having to request an account through a contact form just to edit an article [1] doesn't really live up to the “wiki” part. [1]: https://wikenigma.org.uk/info/notes_for_contributors/become

Interestingly, "wiki" means (in Hawaiian) "fast" (used by Ward Cunningham in '95 for "very fast web"). So, no, the process may not be fast. But in topics like "the best competitive sports club in the world", some may prefer to keep intervention more controlled, depending on the general intention.

More recently, "wiki" seems to be a more concrete concept: a collaboratively edited website, managed by its audience [1]. The project references Wikipedia as an inspiration, and I hope it can live up to similar ideals.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki

Re: Wikenigma is an encyclopedia for topics with unknown answers

#22
Irrational Numbers

Not sure what I am supposed to get from that. Irrational numbers are just reals that aren't rationals. Why is this enigmatic?

It's marked as Known Unknowns, but what is unknown?

Virtually all numbers are irrational. Are numbers enigmatic?

Re: Wikenigma is an encyclopedia for topics with unknown answers

#24

I noticed this on the page about infinity: > Are some infinities larger than others? But didn't Cantor prove the answer to that is "yes" back in the 19th century?

Yes. Trivially, uncountable infinities have to be larger than countable infinities do they not? The set of reals contains within it the set of integers for example but also contains a bunch of other stuff. (Not a mathematician obviously).

That argument turns out not to be enough! A counterexample is the set of rational numbers, which has the same cardinality as the natural numbers, even though the naturals are a proper subset of the rationals.

Some infinite sets can be put into one-to-one correspondence with some of their proper subsets!

Re: Wikenigma is an encyclopedia for topics with unknown answers

#25
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it's on a shoddy webserver and is already being hn'd. A refresh fixed it for me. Certainly not confidence inspiring but from the pages I visited it seems to be an excellent aggregator. Short summary, long enough for me to gadge if I want to head to Wikipedia. Thank god for that, was worried it was going to be another wiki that is essentially just an unmaintained Wikipedia fork slowly diverging away

How many users on HN are there that this keeps happening ? A few hundred in a few minutes is enough to take down a website? I've noticed that this keeps happening .

One of my blog articles got on the front page of HN a while ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29185971

In total, I saw roughly around 27'000 views (that entire day, load varied, too lazy to figure out the peak RPS value), which meant just short of 8 GB of data being transferred and in my case over 500'000 files being requested (given all of the CSS files, images, JavaScript etc.).

Now, the blog held out fine, because it was based on Grav, which means that it ends up being a bunch of flat files: https://getgrav.org/

It is especially interesting when you consider that I had capped the container that it was running in to 512M of RAM at max and also 0.75 CPU cores, just so it wouldn't slow down the entire node (can't really afford to have a separate server for it).

So in essence, I think that static files can be served really well with limited resources, but once you throw complicated PHP apps (think WordPress), insufficient caching and also database access (especially with any sub-optimally written code) as well as perhaps even something like mod_php instead of fpm, things can indeed go wrong.

I've seen enterprise projects struggle with 100 RPM due to exceedingly poorly written data fetching, N+1 problems and developers not knowing how to avoid running into issues like that or outright not caring because of the system being an internal one and the infrastructure having resources to waste.

In my case, even the cheap 100 Mbps link was enough to serve all of the requests with minimal impact (i think the longest page load was up to 4 seconds at peak load, most others were lower, less than 2 seconds).

Re: Wikenigma is an encyclopedia for topics with unknown answers

#26
post #22

Irrational Numbers Not sure what I am supposed to get from that. Irrational numbers are just reals that aren't rationals. Why is this enigmatic? It's marked as Known Unknowns, but what is unknown? Virtually all numbers are irrational. Are numbers enigmatic?

> It's marked as Known Unknowns, but what is unknown?

The infinite digits of pi that we don't know. But we do know that they exist, so pi, or any other irrational number, will aptly be called a "known unknown."

> Virtually all numbers are irrational.

For every n irrational numbers you name, I can name n+1 rationals. There is no firm basis to the argument that there are somehow more irrational numbers than rational numbers.

Re: Wikenigma is an encyclopedia for topics with unknown answers

#27
post #11

While I found the concept interesting, having to request an account through a contact form just to edit an article [1] doesn't really live up to the “wiki” part. [1]: https://wikenigma.org.uk/info/notes_for_contributors/become

Probably to prevent spam, without a community of moderators and tools it would be unworkable for them most likely.

Re: Wikenigma is an encyclopedia for topics with unknown answers

#28
post #11

While I found the concept interesting, having to request an account through a contact form just to edit an article [1] doesn't really live up to the “wiki” part. [1]: https://wikenigma.org.uk/info/notes_for_contributors/become

Probably to prevent spam, without a community of moderators and tools it would be unworkable for them most likely.

Quite a number of webforums have had to adopt this (request account) process due to insane levels of SEO spam overwhelming mods.

Re: Wikenigma is an encyclopedia for topics with unknown answers

#29
post #21
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Interestingly, "wiki" means (in Hawaiian) "fast" (used by Ward Cunningham in '95 for "very fast web"). So, no, the process may not be fast. But in topics like "the best competitive sports club in the world", some may prefer to keep intervention more controlled, depending on the general intention.

More recently, "wiki" seems to be a more concrete concept: a collaboratively edited website, managed by its audience [1]. The project references Wikipedia as an inspiration, and I hope it can live up to similar ideals. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki

> collaboratively edited website

Yes, but there are parts of it in terminology awareness gone slightly messy:

in 'wikipedia', the educational part is in '-poedia' ("children", hence "learners"); 'wiki-' reflects the concept that the operation on the content must be apt to be quick - which is exactly the direct interpretation that appears in your parent post («a contact form just to edit an article doesn't really live up to the “wiki” part»).

"Quick" there is not just "free of red tape": I understand the first idea of Cunningham was about distributed access to a relational database for collaborative editing, in the simplest and directmost possible way.

So, 'wiki-' in the current common use could be more like the truncation of 'wikiweb' (already containing interesting convergences of meaning in "web" as "collaboration", not just "network of frontends"). "Wiki-" per se would indicate more the "hassle free" side of the technology.

Re: Wikenigma is an encyclopedia for topics with unknown answers

#30
post #22

Irrational Numbers Not sure what I am supposed to get from that. Irrational numbers are just reals that aren't rationals. Why is this enigmatic? It's marked as Known Unknowns, but what is unknown? Virtually all numbers are irrational. Are numbers enigmatic?

> It's marked as Known Unknowns, but what is unknown? The infinite digits of pi that we don't know. But we do know that they exist, so pi, or any other irrational number, will aptly be called a "known unknown." > Virtually all numbers are irrational. For every n irrational numbers you name, I can name n+1 rationals. There is no firm basis to the argument that there are somehow more irrational numbers than rational nu…

Do you reject Cantor's proof then? That takes mathematical bollocks.
Post reply on HN