Does anyone actually like using JIRA? Or Confluence? Or any of the Atlassian products?
Atlassian is 20 years old and unprofitable
21–30 of 515 posts
Re: Atlassian is 20 years old and unprofitable
#22> While it is still used by many tech businesses (including the author’s), it has no real network effect — that is, users can switch to a competitor product like Asana, Basecamp or Monday.com with minimal cost (other than the initial hassle of switching to a new system). Lol. At some companies, Jira workflows literally run the whole company. At my prev job, prod deployments were tightly linked to Jira.
Because that is where Jira primarily plays. In enterprise companies where it's rolled out across the organisation with tentacles firmly embedded into almost every process and system.
And whilst people continue to criticise Jira it continues to grow because in reality it competes with products like Rally not Asana. And there really isn't anything out there that can offer the same level of customisability and flexibility.
Re: Atlassian is 20 years old and unprofitable
#23Does anyone actually like using JIRA? Or Confluence? Or any of the Atlassian products?
Re: Atlassian is 20 years old and unprofitable
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well its not a cheap product, I suspect its just a massive knot of complexity and thus massively expensive to maintain and manage.
Massive pile of garbage is more like it. As a developer, the only thing slowing me down from getting work done was waiting on JIRA and being told to use the crap they call Confluence to document things.
Re: Atlassian is 20 years old and unprofitable
#25> While it is still used by many tech businesses (including the author’s), it has no real network effect — that is, users can switch to a competitor product like Asana, Basecamp or Monday.com with minimal cost (other than the initial hassle of switching to a new system). Lol. At some companies, Jira workflows literally run the whole company. At my prev job, prod deployments were tightly linked to Jira.
Yes - JIRA is almost a textbook example of lock in. Moving a large company's workflow would mean months of disruption.
Re: Atlassian is 20 years old and unprofitable
#26I didn't realize that they were unprofitable; not good. I don't think they should be valued as a pre-profit/pre-revenue growth stock - as the article says - the product doesn't really have network effects or strong lock-in.
Re: Atlassian is 20 years old and unprofitable
#27Does anyone actually like using JIRA? Or Confluence? Or any of the Atlassian products?
Jira and Bitbucket, OTOH, the less said about them the better.
Re: Atlassian is 20 years old and unprofitable
#28What are the equivalents for Jira ?
Is there an openish source piece of similar software ?
Jira cops a lot of hate on HN, but really to paraphrase Churchill on Democracy - "Jira is the worst issue tracking software, except for all the others".
The comparison on Wikipedia has so many of them : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_issue-tracking_s...
Are any of them any better?
Re: Atlassian is 20 years old and unprofitable
#29Does anyone actually like using JIRA? Or Confluence? Or any of the Atlassian products?
Yes, I like Trello. Although that was acquired.
(Hence the acquisition presumably, probably gained them not just the talent but a lot of mindshare and extant SME/startup business.)
Re: Atlassian is 20 years old and unprofitable
#30Does anyone actually like using JIRA? Or Confluence? Or any of the Atlassian products?