Live data from Hacker News

Fighting crime by checking buildings, not suspects

newsnationnow.com

21–30 of 143 posts

Re: Fighting crime by checking buildings, not suspects

#21
post #6

> Overall, proactive enforcement activity — where police were affirmatively going out and making these stops and similar interventions — dropped by around 60 percent in these areas. These are impressive numbers, but I wonder: Where did the crime go? Were most of these merely crimes of opportunity which got eliminated, or did some other areas see a spike instead?

David Kennedy, author of "Don't Shoot", was on the radio talking about his approach. He said by closing the open drug markets in the street the drugs have to be traded in people's houses and the other elements aren't attracted to the area. He then said something like "You know what we used to call the places where drugs are sold quietly inside people's houses? The suburbs."

It's a really good book. Totally opened my mind that these problems are tractable so long as the typical dynamic of cops and clockers is put away in exchange for a focus on the community.

Re: Fighting crime by checking buildings, not suspects

#22

"This site is currently unavailable to visitors from the European Economic Area while we work to ensure your data is protected in accordance with applicable EU laws." Translation: "We can't put an article online without cramming it with cookies, analytics and other annoyances that serve no other purpose than profiling users; we actually don't want to protect your data, but they caught us with the pants down and enact…

It is a tricky thing. At some point someone needs to be paid for writing the article. I can think of 3 ways to accomplish that at the moment: 1. Government subsidizes media. No cookies or profiling required. However, unclear if one government should support articles that are mostly read abroad and, of course, there are many issues with this related to equitable distribution of funds and impartiality. 2. They can run…

There is also the Spotify model, where a subscription gets you access to everything, and publishers get paid for what’s read.

Re: Fighting crime by checking buildings, not suspects

#23
post #6

> Overall, proactive enforcement activity — where police were affirmatively going out and making these stops and similar interventions — dropped by around 60 percent in these areas. These are impressive numbers, but I wonder: Where did the crime go? Were most of these merely crimes of opportunity which got eliminated, or did some other areas see a spike instead?

I would guess that low-effort opportunistic crimes may have been prevented, but entrenched criminal enterprises will have just relocated.

Re: Fighting crime by checking buildings, not suspects

#24
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is a tricky thing. At some point someone needs to be paid for writing the article. I can think of 3 ways to accomplish that at the moment: 1. Government subsidizes media. No cookies or profiling required. However, unclear if one government should support articles that are mostly read abroad and, of course, there are many issues with this related to equitable distribution of funds and impartiality. 2. They can run…

There is also the Spotify model, where a subscription gets you access to everything, and publishers get paid for what’s read.

Spotify is one of a handful of music streaming products out there, and an absolute juggernaut that gives you access to basically all music and podcasts. By contrast, there are thousands of news sites, and subscribing to one of them only gives you access to their content. There is absolute no way "News Nation" is going to get enough dedicated subscribers to subsidize their reporting.

Re: Fighting crime by checking buildings, not suspects

#25

"This site is currently unavailable to visitors from the European Economic Area while we work to ensure your data is protected in accordance with applicable EU laws." Translation: "We can't put an article online without cramming it with cookies, analytics and other annoyances that serve no other purpose than profiling users; we actually don't want to protect your data, but they caught us with the pants down and enact…

"all of our pages are full of things that the EU wants us to ask permission for. Since we only get a small amount of EU traffic, we can't be bothered to spend the money to deal with your laws, please go do something else. You are important to us - elsewhere."

Re: Fighting crime by checking buildings, not suspects

#26

Topic reminds me of the book, A Burglar's Guide to the City: https://www.amazon.com/Burglars-Guide-City-Geoff-Manaugh/dp/... Which started out as a blog: https://bldgblog.com/ Unlike the book, this city appears to think the solution to all their problems is to remove the architectures causing issues, instead of trying to make city planning and management choices that enable positive behavior; successful areas don’t h…

> what’s next, make warrentless, no knock searches legal

For 60% of the US population, this is already the case. Not by police, but border agents have been granted warrantless hone access by the supreme court this month: https://nitter.net/anildash/status/1534639563167105025#m

Re: Fighting crime by checking buildings, not suspects

#27

This is like solving homelessness by putting spikes on benches to keep people from sleeping there: It doesn't solve the problem, it just pushes it out of your jurisdiction.

the spikes aren't there to solve homelessness, they're there to keep people from sleeping on the benches.

Re: Fighting crime by checking buildings, not suspects

#28
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is also the Spotify model, where a subscription gets you access to everything, and publishers get paid for what’s read.

Spotify is one of a handful of music streaming products out there, and an absolute juggernaut that gives you access to basically all music and podcasts. By contrast, there are thousands of news sites, and subscribing to one of them only gives you access to their content. There is absolute no way "News Nation" is going to get enough dedicated subscribers to subsidize their reporting.

> There is absolute no way "News Nation" is going to get enough dedicated subscribers to subsidize their reporting.

That’s exactly why there should be a Spotify for text.

Re: Fighting crime by checking buildings, not suspects

#29

Topic reminds me of the book, A Burglar's Guide to the City: https://www.amazon.com/Burglars-Guide-City-Geoff-Manaugh/dp/... Which started out as a blog: https://bldgblog.com/ Unlike the book, this city appears to think the solution to all their problems is to remove the architectures causing issues, instead of trying to make city planning and management choices that enable positive behavior; successful areas don’t h…

They usually don't have them because someone cares enough to keep the fire lit, usually people with a lot of free time. I have lived in successful areas that had an abandoned building with boarded up windows. Soon a local started pushing the city to get involved until it was finally condemned, as the owner didn't want to sell it to someone who would use it.

I can see how poor areas, especially with lots of renters and slumlords, are going to be less proactive themselves.

Re: Fighting crime by checking buildings, not suspects

#30

"This site is currently unavailable to visitors from the European Economic Area while we work to ensure your data is protected in accordance with applicable EU laws." Translation: "We can't put an article online without cramming it with cookies, analytics and other annoyances that serve no other purpose than profiling users; we actually don't want to protect your data, but they caught us with the pants down and enact…

Thanks to the EU, the internet is more balkanized than before.
Post reply on HN